2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing human exposure to PM2.5 generated while cooking typical Chinese cuisine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pollution from household cooking explains household PM 2.5 exposure to residents, especially household wives, worldwide. Previous studies widely discussed the differences in emission of PM 2.5 between types of fuels, 13,101,102 cooking styles, 98,102,103 and protection strategies 103,104 . Protective measures such as opening range hood and opening windows during cooking time are effective for reducing residents' exposure to household PM 2.5 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pollution from household cooking explains household PM 2.5 exposure to residents, especially household wives, worldwide. Previous studies widely discussed the differences in emission of PM 2.5 between types of fuels, 13,101,102 cooking styles, 98,102,103 and protection strategies 103,104 . Protective measures such as opening range hood and opening windows during cooking time are effective for reducing residents' exposure to household PM 2.5 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both models use the light-scattering method to measure the indoor PM concentration, but the costs differ by more than 10 times. While AM510 is already used by numerous studies owing to its verified accuracy and reliability, TES-5322 has not been frequently used despite its economic efficiency [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ]. The measurement accuracy of TES-5322 is below ±5 μg/m 3 when the PM 2.5 concentration is less than 50 μg/m 3 and below ± 10% when the PM 2.5 concentration is greater than 50 μg/m 3 .…”
Section: Experimental Methods and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found a wide range in the capture efficiency from <15% to 98% [21][22][23][24]. Zhao et al evaluated the efficacy of multiple intervention strategies, including range hood, face mask, personal portable fan, and air cleaner, to reduce PM2.5 exposure in a Chinese kitchen [25]. They found that using a range hood with an equivalent air exchange rate of 7.5-10.9 h -1 and wearing a face mask during cooking reduced 90-95% and 79-84% PM2.5 exposure for the cook, respectively [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhao et al evaluated the efficacy of multiple intervention strategies, including range hood, face mask, personal portable fan, and air cleaner, to reduce PM2.5 exposure in a Chinese kitchen [25]. They found that using a range hood with an equivalent air exchange rate of 7.5-10.9 h -1 and wearing a face mask during cooking reduced 90-95% and 79-84% PM2.5 exposure for the cook, respectively [25]. Additionally, a recent study evaluated the efficacy of using portable air cleaners (PACs) during cooking events in six US homes [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%