1985
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.290.6466.421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing errors in the accident department: a simple method using radiographers.

Abstract: The assessments by radiographers of 1628 consecutive patients referred for radiography in the casualty department were analysed. The radiographers missed abnormalities in the radiographs in 68 of the cases. Casualty officers missed abnormalities in 63 cases, but only 35 patients were common to both groups. Twenty eight of the radiographs interpreted wrongly by casualty officers were interpreted correctly by radiographers; 16 of these 28 were thought by the accident and emergency consultant to be clinically imp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
60
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparative terms, the results here are similar to those of previous studies [2][3][4][6][7][8][9]. For the combined system (red dot and SHO diagnosis), the FNR was 5.3% (4.0-6.9%) and the FPR was 8.9% (7.3-10.1%) (the denominator was taken to be the total number of X-rays).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In comparative terms, the results here are similar to those of previous studies [2][3][4][6][7][8][9]. For the combined system (red dot and SHO diagnosis), the FNR was 5.3% (4.0-6.9%) and the FPR was 8.9% (7.3-10.1%) (the denominator was taken to be the total number of X-rays).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…A marked variation is found in the reported figures: for ED physicians, the false negative rates (FNRs) range from 0.5 to 5% [2,[4][5][6][7][8][9] and the false positive rates (FPRs) range from 1.2 to 11.4% [2]. Radiographers' diagnostic performance has also varied with FNR ranging from 4.5 to 4.6% [2,10] and FPR from 2.5 to 4.7% [2].…”
Section: Brian H Willis and Shyamaly D Surmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Radiology departments should give priority to reporting ED films and the best solution is to have an immediate reporting system. Marking of abnormal radiographs by radiographers can assist in reducing diagnostic errors [17] but the value of this may be limited by a high rate of false positives. [18] Few EDs have a full-time radiologist on duty 24 hours a day.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%