2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing discrimination in the field: Evidence from an awareness raising intervention targeting gender biases in student evaluations of teaching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are important for practice and future research as they show that, even though an intervention is well-intended and has been proven to be effective in another context (Boring and Philippe, 2021), it can have no or even a negative effect. Many organizations throughout the world have taken initiatives to fight discrimination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our findings are important for practice and future research as they show that, even though an intervention is well-intended and has been proven to be effective in another context (Boring and Philippe, 2021), it can have no or even a negative effect. Many organizations throughout the world have taken initiatives to fight discrimination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In addition to encouragement, the email gives some information about current discrimination in amateur soccer, mentioning that studies have shown that pla ers ith foreig -sounding names are less likely to get a respo se he o ta ti g a lu for the first ti e . Providing such information about the prevalence of discrimination can be essentialas shown by Boring and Philippe (2021) because people are not always aware that they discriminate (Bertrand et al, 2005;Rooth, 2010). The NFF sent the email two weeks preceding the correspondence test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In what follows, I assess the extent to which the results may differ by student gender, as previously documented in the literature (Boring, 2017;Boring et al, 2016;Boring & Philippe, 2021;Fan et al, 2019;Mengel et al, 2019). Panel C in Table 6 presents the results for separate regressions that considered both the gender of the lecturer and that of the student.…”
Section: Studentsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A number of studies have previously investigated gender bias in teaching evaluation, with the results always pointing in the same direction: female instructors are discriminated against in evaluations of their teaching (Boring, 2017;Boring et al, 2016;Boring & Philippe, 2021;Mengel et al, 2019;Wagner et al, 2016). 4 These studies found that differences in the teaching scores by gender cannot be explained by differences in teacher effectiveness, performance or skills.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%