2019
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab4c06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing crosstalk in optically-pumped magnetometer arrays

Abstract: Magnetoencephalography (MEG) measures small magnetic fields (femtotesla to picotesla) generated by neuronal currents within the brain and has led to insights into neural activity at millisecond time scales (Supek and Aine 2014). Most MEG systems are based on low-temperature superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs). The SQUIDs are housed in a helmet-shaped liquid helium dewar with roughly 2 cm of space between the SQUIDs and the inside surface of the helmet. Since the magnetic field falls off quick… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as the distance between magnetometers decreases, the modulating coils from one sensor start to influence the measurements of nearby sensors [27]. To address this problem in hardware, we have developed more sophisticated feedback coils than a simple Helmholtz geometry and have reduced the crosstalk from 8% to 0.8% at the closest possible sensor spacing of 1.25 cm and from 2% to 0.1% between the two magnetometers that constitute a gradiometer with 2 cm spacing [28]. This has not yet been implemented in this array but is a crucial next step in advancing OPM-based MEG technology.…”
Section: Closed-loop Operationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as the distance between magnetometers decreases, the modulating coils from one sensor start to influence the measurements of nearby sensors [27]. To address this problem in hardware, we have developed more sophisticated feedback coils than a simple Helmholtz geometry and have reduced the crosstalk from 8% to 0.8% at the closest possible sensor spacing of 1.25 cm and from 2% to 0.1% between the two magnetometers that constitute a gradiometer with 2 cm spacing [28]. This has not yet been implemented in this array but is a crucial next step in advancing OPM-based MEG technology.…”
Section: Closed-loop Operationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem is static (if the sensors do not move relative to one another) and deterministic but assumes that a suitable calibration procedure is in place to correct for these issues 48 . Additionally the use of custom designed on-board coils can reduce the impact of this issue 49 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the average sensor spacings are increased from 22mm (for single axis only) to 32mm for triaxial. Increasing the distance between sensors by 50% will have the added benefit of reducing the effects of sensor cross-talk (Nardelli et al, 2019) by a factor > 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%