Reducing avoidable inequalities in health: a new criterion for setting health care capitation payments

Abstract

SummaryTraditionally, most health care systems which pretend to any sort of rationality and cost control have sought to allocate their limited funds in order to secure equal opportunity of access for equal need. The UK government is implementing a fundamental change of resource allocation philosophy towards 'contributing to the reduction of avoidable health inequalities'. The purpose of this essay is to explore some of the economic issues that arise when seeking to allocate health care resources according to the new criterion. It indicates that health inequalities might arise because of variations in the quality of health services, variations in access to those services, or variations in the way people produce health, and that the resource allocation consequences differ depending on which source is being addressed. The paper shows that an objective of reducing health inequalities is not necessarily compatible with an objective of equity of access, nor with the objective of maximising health gain. The results have profound consequences for approaches towards economic evaluation, the role of clinical guidelines and performance management, as well as for resource allocation methods. Copyright

Public and private health‐care financing with alternate public rationing rules

“…Allocation according to need is the stated objective of many publicly financed health-care systems (van Doorslaer et al, 1993). In our environment, allocation by severity levels is consistent with allocation according to need under commonly cited interpretations of need (Culyer and Wagstaff, 1993) and with allocation of health services to reduce (avoidable) inequality in the distribution of health in the population (Hauck et al, 2002).…”

Health, Social Insurance and Income

“…Hauk et al (2002) suggest variations in health production functions must be considered when addressing variations in healthcare quality and health services utilization. Individuals may share the same health problems and use the same level and quality of health services, yet their health outcomes may vary.…”

Modelling supply and demand influences on the use of health care: implications for deriving a needs‐based capitation formula

“…Equal access for equal need is by no means unproblematic as an objective [8] and policy makers have signalled a greater concern to reduce inequalities in health outcomes [28]. However, equity of access remains the main driver of NHS resource allocation.…”