2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2008.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced tillage effects on physical properties of silt loam soils growing root crops

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is frequently used for crops such as potatoes and beet that are not suitable for CF. Reduced forms of ridge tillage have been shown to improve the soil physical quality and favor N mineralization in Belgium [164,165]. Contour farming involves developing cropping practices along the field contours, especially in sloping areas.…”
Section: Other Sustainable Crop Management Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is frequently used for crops such as potatoes and beet that are not suitable for CF. Reduced forms of ridge tillage have been shown to improve the soil physical quality and favor N mineralization in Belgium [164,165]. Contour farming involves developing cropping practices along the field contours, especially in sloping areas.…”
Section: Other Sustainable Crop Management Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tillage influences physical and chemical processes in soil (Hedley et al, 1982;Vu et al, 2009) and may therefore also affect the retention and stabilization of P (Wright, 2009;Messiga et al, 2011). Intensive tillage may decrease soil organic matter (SOM) content and soil structure compared to reduced tillage (D'Haene et al, 2008), potentially reducing organically bound P (P o ) and resulting in increased P losses through different aggregate dynamics, erosion, and runoff (Scholz et al, 2008). Tillage also mixes the soil to a certain depth, preventing a stratification within the tilled soil layer (Vu et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selon Basic et al (2004); Hannachi et al (2010) réduire l'intensité et la profondeur du travail du sol conduit en général à une augmentation de la densité apparente du sol mais pas au-delà de l'ancien fond de labour. Pour les auteurs (D'Haene et al, 2008;Dec et al, 2008;Touahria, 2012), les socs du chisel, en fragmentant le sol, réduisent la prise en masse du sol sur la profondeur de travail de l'outil et à long terme (> 11 ans), il semblerait que la densité apparente du sol est identique à celle d'un sol labouré.…”
Section: Materiel Et Methodes Essai En Stationunclassified