1999
DOI: 10.1007/s002650050593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced take-off ability in robins ( Erithacus rubecula ) due to migratory fuel load

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
91
1
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
91
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is opposite that of trends in previous work. Take-off angles generally decrease with increased body mass (Witter et al, 1994;Kullberg et al, 1996;Lind et al, 1999), and male cowbirds tend to have greater body mass than females (Lowther, 1993). Our findings could instead indicate that the sexes have different escape strategies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…This result is opposite that of trends in previous work. Take-off angles generally decrease with increased body mass (Witter et al, 1994;Kullberg et al, 1996;Lind et al, 1999), and male cowbirds tend to have greater body mass than females (Lowther, 1993). Our findings could instead indicate that the sexes have different escape strategies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…For example, muscles and/or neuromuscular coordination may be less developed at a given size in fast-growing individuals (Weatherley and Gill 1987;Valente et al 1999). The increased weight or frictional drag of a stomach filled with food may also contribute to reduced locomotion (DeBenedictis et al 1978;Lind et al 1999). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy stores also relieve them temporarily from the need to forage such that they can allocate more time to other activities. On the cost side, increased mass reduces manoeuvrability and take-off ability and increases predation risk (Lindströ m and Alerstam 1992; Lind et al 1999;Nudds and Bryant 2002). There is only a small metabolic cost of maintenance of fat (SchmidtNielsen 1997), but carrying an increased mass during flight in general may well raise the energetic costs of locomotion in a significant way.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%