Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1994.tb00556.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced Synchronization in the Visual Cortex of Cats with Strabismic Amblyopia

Abstract: Synchronous firing of spatially separate neurons was studied with multi-electrode recordings in area 17 of the visual cortex of strabismic cats which had developed behaviourally verified amblyopia of the deviated eye. Responses of neurons were evoked with moving light bars or gratings of different spatial frequency. Neurons driven by the normal eye displayed stronger synchronization of their responses than neurons dominated by the amblyopic eye. These interocular differences were highly significant and particu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
110
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
7
110
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Taken together, these experiments demonstrate that Gestalt criteria such as continuity or coherent motion, which have psychophysically been shown to support perceptual grouping, are important for the establishment of precise synchrony among neurons in the visual cortex. These data strongly support the Roelfsema et al 1994) hypothesis that correlated firing provides a dynamic mechanism for feature binding and response selection.…”
Section: Evidence For Temporal Bindingsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Taken together, these experiments demonstrate that Gestalt criteria such as continuity or coherent motion, which have psychophysically been shown to support perceptual grouping, are important for the establishment of precise synchrony among neurons in the visual cortex. These data strongly support the Roelfsema et al 1994) hypothesis that correlated firing provides a dynamic mechanism for feature binding and response selection.…”
Section: Evidence For Temporal Bindingsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Clearly, at least some of these deficits indicate a reduced capacity of integrating visual information and an impairment of the mechanisms responsible for feature binding. The results of the correlation study by Roelfsema et al (1994) indicate that these perceptual deficits may be due to a disturbance of intracortical interactions (see figure 8.2). Thus, clear di¤erences were observed in the synchronization of cells driven by the normal and the amblyopic eye, respectively.…”
Section: Evidence For Temporal Bindingmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The normally distinct digit representations were also integrated together after extensive operant training with stimuli that simultaneously activate several fingers (Wang et al, 1995). In primary visual cortex, both strabismus and alternating electrical stimulation of the optic nerves disrupt the normally high correlation between the eyes and increase the segregation of inputs from each eye (Eschweiler and Rauschecker, 1993;Hubel and Wiesel, 1965;Roelfsema et al, 1994;Stryker and Strickland, 1984). These and other results suggest that simultaneous activation of neural networks leads to greater integration of sensory inputs, while asynchronous activation leads to segregation (Clark et al, 1988;Constantine-Paton and Law, 1978;Hubel and Wiesel, 1965;Stryker and Strickland, 1984;Wang et al, 1995).…”
Section: Similarity With Earlier Plasticity Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, desynchronization between two dynamic cell assemblies is not only a possibility but can be observed in both the real brain and simulations where changes in synchrony have, in some instances, been found to occur without any change in mean ring rate. Such regional decoupling of spike timing and ring rates has been reported in primary sensory cortices (Roelfsema, Konig, Engel, Sireteanu, & Singer, 1994;deCharms & Merzenich, 1996;Fries, Roelfsma, Engel, Konig, & Singer, 1997) and may re ect feedback in uences from higher cortical areas (Lumer et al, 1997b). Our input stimulus consisted of unstructured random noise that did not have any spatiotemporal structure.…”
Section: Uncoupling Of Activity and Synchronizationmentioning
confidence: 99%