2016
DOI: 10.1002/ecy.1599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced snow cover alters root‐microbe interactions and decreases nitrification rates in a northern hardwood forest

Abstract: Snow cover is projected to decline during the next century in many ecosystems that currently experience a seasonal snowpack. Because snow insulates soils from frigid winter air temperatures, soils are expected to become colder and experience more winter soil freeze‐thaw cycles as snow cover continues to decline. Tree roots are adversely affected by snowpack reduction, but whether loss of snow will affect root‐microbe interactions remains largely unknown. The objective of this study was to distinguish and attri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While we did not explicitly quantify rates of root turnover in our experiment, Comerford et al (2013) found root electrolyte leakage in our snow-removal plots to be 37% higher than in our reference plots, indicating elevated rates of root damage. These findings may suggest a shift in tree C allocation away from long-lived C pools in aboveground woody biomass and toward short-lived pools belowground to regrow fine roots, which is consistent with studies showing increases in compensatory root growth following soil freezing (Sorensen, Templer, Christenson et al, 2016;Tierney et al, 2001). Increased root damage and mortality are commonly observed responses to soil freezing, and our findings of reduced tree growth and forest C uptake may therefore extend to other systems where root damage is observed, such as Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) H. Karst) forests in Germany (Gaul et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…While we did not explicitly quantify rates of root turnover in our experiment, Comerford et al (2013) found root electrolyte leakage in our snow-removal plots to be 37% higher than in our reference plots, indicating elevated rates of root damage. These findings may suggest a shift in tree C allocation away from long-lived C pools in aboveground woody biomass and toward short-lived pools belowground to regrow fine roots, which is consistent with studies showing increases in compensatory root growth following soil freezing (Sorensen, Templer, Christenson et al, 2016;Tierney et al, 2001). Increased root damage and mortality are commonly observed responses to soil freezing, and our findings of reduced tree growth and forest C uptake may therefore extend to other systems where root damage is observed, such as Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) H. Karst) forests in Germany (Gaul et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Warming decreases soil temperatures in winter, as warmer air temperatures reduce snowpack and increase the extent and frequency of soil freeze/thaw events (Campbell et al, 2010;Brown and DeGaetano, 2011). Although warming during the snow-free times of year can initially increase C and nitrogen (N) fluxes as decomposition of soil organic matter increases (Rustad et al, 2001;Knorr et al, 2005;Brzostek and Finzi, 2011;Romero-Olivares et al, 2017), these effects can be reversed over the short term by increased frequency of soil freeze/thaw cycles in winter (Durán et al, 2014;Sorensen et al, 2016Sorensen et al, , 2018. Additional storage or loss of soil C and nutrients over the longer term will be determined by how the biogeochemical cycling activities of soil microorganisms ("effect traits") are linked to traits that allow microbial species to persist under environmental stressors ("response traits") (Allison and Martiny, 2008;Shade et al, 2012;Koide et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike findings from previous snow manipulation studies in the region (e.g. Pilon, Côté, and Fyles 1994;Boutin and Robitaille 1995;Fitzhugh et al 2001;Reinmann et al 2012;Campbell et al 2014b;Sorensen et al 2016 decline in the microbial biomass (Schmidt et al 2007). It is likely that this turnover occurred around 22 April in 2015 and 8 March in 2016, as evidenced by the low SUVA 254 values (Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Forest Typementioning
confidence: 58%
“…Most snow manipulation experiments in northeastern North America have been conducted in hardwood stands (e.g. Boutin and Robitaille 1995;Fitzhugh et al 2001;Groffman et al 2001Groffman et al , 2011Campbell et al 2014b;Reinmann and Templer 2016;Sorensen et al 2016), while similar studies in coniferous forests have mostly been conducted in Europe (Sulkava and Huhta 2003;Hentschel et al 2008Hentschel et al , 2009Öquist and Laudon 2008;Haei et al 2012). Conifers account for approximately 50% of total forest cover in eastern Canada (Canada's National Forest Inventory 2013) and approximately 16% of total forest cover in the northeastern United States (Oswalt et al 2018) -more dominant in some regions like Maine where 33% of the forest cover is coniferous (Huff and McWilliams 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%