2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.rasd.2014.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced representational momentum for subtle dynamic facial expressions in individuals with autism spectrum disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
20
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(57 reference statements)
2
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All these domains have been reported as abnormal in autism [Glazebrook et al, ; Koldewyn et al, ; Marko et al, ] and all can be linked to the inverse computation. For example, earlier studies have reported impairments in biological motion detection [Blake et al, ; Koldewyn et al, ], reduced sensitivity to naturalness of hand motion [Cook, Saygin, Swain, & Blakemore, ], and deficits in perceiving dynamic facial expressions [Tardif et al, ; Uono et al, ; Shah et al, ]. However, there are also reports of normal motor control and learning [Gidley‐Larson et al, ], and normal perception of biological motion [Jones et al ; Cusack et al, ] in autism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All these domains have been reported as abnormal in autism [Glazebrook et al, ; Koldewyn et al, ; Marko et al, ] and all can be linked to the inverse computation. For example, earlier studies have reported impairments in biological motion detection [Blake et al, ; Koldewyn et al, ], reduced sensitivity to naturalness of hand motion [Cook, Saygin, Swain, & Blakemore, ], and deficits in perceiving dynamic facial expressions [Tardif et al, ; Uono et al, ; Shah et al, ]. However, there are also reports of normal motor control and learning [Gidley‐Larson et al, ], and normal perception of biological motion [Jones et al ; Cusack et al, ] in autism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several processes which are considered to involve direct mapping of observed motion to self‐action have also been described as abnormal in autism. These include motor interference [Cook, Swapp, Pan, Bianchi‐Berthouze, & Blakemore, ; Théoret et al, ], imitation of action kinematics [see Gowen, for review], and biological motion perception [Blake, Turner, Smoski, Pozdol, & Stone, ; Tardif, Lainé, Rodriguez, & Gepner, ; Koldewyn, Whitney, & Rivera, ; Cook et al, ; Uono, Sato, & Toichi, ; Shah, Bird, & Cook, ]. However, some of these results are controversial [Gowen, Stanley, & Miall, ; Jones et al ; Cusack, Williams, & Neri, ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DANVA-2 uses static images of faces, for which FER may be more difficult (i.e. less naturalistic) compared to viewing dynamic faces [92]. However, assessment of FER when processing faces that may be more challenging may yield greater insight into how these processes work in youth with ASD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors reported that participants tended to choose an image of greater emotional intensity than was actually presented, which they interpreted as the result of RM. This anticipation effect for faces has since been replicated (Marian & Shimamura, 2013;Palumbo & Jellema, 2013;Uono, Sato & Toichi, 2014). It is noticeable that these studies used either videos of faces morphing from neutral towards an emotion, or relatively long sequences of static images, beginning with a neutral face and ending at an emotion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%