2005
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.43.8.4175-4177.2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced Rate of Diagnostic Positive Detection of JC Virus DNA in Cerebrospinal Fluid in Cases of Suspected Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy in the Era of Potent Antiretroviral Therapy

Abstract: Fifty-nine human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with suspected progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and 224 controls were tested for JC virus (JCV) DNA in cerebrospinal fluid by PCR. The diagnostic positive detection rate dropped from 89.5% (95% confidence intervals of 75.5 to 103.5%) in the pre-highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) era to 57.5% (95% confidence intervals of 42.1 to 72.9%) in the HAART era; the specificity remained unchanged. Predictors of failure to detect JCV DNA … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
71
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
71
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This low detection rate may be due to non-specificity of radiological findings (Antinori et al, 1997) or insensitivity of PCR, or perhaps due to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) re-establishing host immune function and reducing JCV below detectable levels (Koralnik, 2006). These possibilities are supported by the findings that PML is often difficult to distinguish radiographically from lesions caused by HIV encephalopathy (Olsen et al, 1988;Koralnik et al, 1999) and that the sensitivity of JCV PCR dropped from 89.5 % in the pre-HAART era (1992)(1993)(1994)(1995) to 57.5 % in the HAART era (1996)(1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002) (Marzocchetti et al, 2005). Interestingly, JCV PCR was also positive in 19 % of patients with abnormal white matter radiology findings suggestive of infection but not characteristic of PML.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…This low detection rate may be due to non-specificity of radiological findings (Antinori et al, 1997) or insensitivity of PCR, or perhaps due to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) re-establishing host immune function and reducing JCV below detectable levels (Koralnik, 2006). These possibilities are supported by the findings that PML is often difficult to distinguish radiographically from lesions caused by HIV encephalopathy (Olsen et al, 1988;Koralnik et al, 1999) and that the sensitivity of JCV PCR dropped from 89.5 % in the pre-HAART era (1992)(1993)(1994)(1995) to 57.5 % in the HAART era (1996)(1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002) (Marzocchetti et al, 2005). Interestingly, JCV PCR was also positive in 19 % of patients with abnormal white matter radiology findings suggestive of infection but not characteristic of PML.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…42 As a result of this, the sensitivity of PCR testing for JCV DNA has dropped to 58%. 81,82 Imaging has become very important in the diagnosis of PML in the post-HAART era. In fact, most recently published diagnostic criteria classify PML as "definite PML" or "presumptive PML" on the basis of clinical presentation and imaging appearances with or without positive brain biopsy/PCR (Table 2).…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 As a result of this, the sensitivity of PCR testing for JCV-DNA is now estimated to be around 58%. 30,31 Berger et al 2013 have also proposed that PML diagnosis should be considered 'possible' when there is evidence of typical imaging and clinical findings with no documentation of JCV either in brain biopsy or in the CSF. 6 In our series, detection of JCV-DNA by PCR in CSF was positive in 20 patients (95%).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%