2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10337-019-03752-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced-Pressure Fiber-in-Needle Sampling of Aldehydes for Room Temperature Assessment of Edible Oils’ Oxidative Stability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To further indicate the supremacy of the proposed microextraction strategy, its significant features were compared with some of the similar reported microextraction methods. 22,[33][34][35][36] As can be seen in Table 2, the proposed procedure shows wider linear ranges and acceptable RSDs, compared to most of the listed procedures. Additionally, the LODs are lower than most of the reported methods, even compared to the method that used a MS detector.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Proposed Methods With Similar Reported Pro...mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To further indicate the supremacy of the proposed microextraction strategy, its significant features were compared with some of the similar reported microextraction methods. 22,[33][34][35][36] As can be seen in Table 2, the proposed procedure shows wider linear ranges and acceptable RSDs, compared to most of the listed procedures. Additionally, the LODs are lower than most of the reported methods, even compared to the method that used a MS detector.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Proposed Methods With Similar Reported Pro...mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…36 However, its LODs and LDRs are not comparable with the reduced-pressure fiber-in-needle method (RP-FIN) technique, which has used a low-pressure dynamic microextraction strategy. 22 Anyhow, the proposed method uses a low-cost and durable fiber and instrumentation (GC-FID), without any derivatization methods.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Proposed Methods With Similar Reported Pro...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations