2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.nme.2022.101354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced physics model of the tokamak Scrape-Off-Layer for pulse design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An important result from the simulations with selfconsistent boundary conditions is the difference from the 'time-slice' simulations in which edge values were prescribed based on results from other devices, cf panels (c) and (d) in figure 15. The computed values of edge temperature through the two-point model [28] are considerably lower than the ≈100 eV initially assumed, e.g. in figure 12.…”
Section: Scenario Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…An important result from the simulations with selfconsistent boundary conditions is the difference from the 'time-slice' simulations in which edge values were prescribed based on results from other devices, cf panels (c) and (d) in figure 15. The computed values of edge temperature through the two-point model [28] are considerably lower than the ≈100 eV initially assumed, e.g. in figure 12.…”
Section: Scenario Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The extension of predictive simulations for T e and T i to the entire discharge, including the current ramp-up and a self-consistent estimate of pedestal parameters, provides more insight on the predicted parameters. It is clear that adding selfconsistent boundary conditions through a reduced scrape-off layer model [28] largely modifies the simulations' outcome, for instance by suggesting more peaked profiles with lower edge temperature than what initially predicted in [7]. Future work will focus on this issue, as well as on the comparison across different thermal transport models to assess the reliability of present numerical tools for scenario predictions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations