2023
DOI: 10.1029/2022sw003345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced Order Probabilistic Emulation for Physics‐Based Thermosphere Models

Abstract: The geospace environment is volatile and highly driven. Space weather has effects on Earth's magnetosphere that cause a dynamic and enigmatic response in the thermosphere, particularly on the evolution of neutral mass density. Many models exist that use space weather drivers to produce a density response, but these models are typically computationally expensive or inaccurate for certain space weather conditions. In response, this work aims to employ a probabilistic machine learning (ML) method to create an eff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Licata and Mehta (2022) discussed the necessary data preparation for LSTM model training. A standard feed forward NN requires the samples to have the same length about the first axis to achieve supervised training.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Licata and Mehta (2022) discussed the necessary data preparation for LSTM model training. A standard feed forward NN requires the samples to have the same length about the first axis to achieve supervised training.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, we adopted the dimensionality reduction for the ionospheric outputs as obtained from REPPU simulations, by applying the principal component analysis (PCA) (e.g., Halko et al., 2011) using the Python 3 scikit‐learn/pca (Pedregosa et al., 2011). Very similar method was used by Licata and Mehta (2023) for different purpose (thermosphere model emulator). The time series of each parameter z = {Σ xy , Φ, or J//}, at certain (latitude, longitude) position of the grid indices ( i , j ), can be represented by the time averaged spatial pattern z 0 and the linear combination of time‐dependent PCA variables α and PCA component patterns U as follows: z(i,j,t)=z0(i,j)+z1(i,j,t), $z(i,j,t)={z}_{0}(i,j)+{z}_{1}(i,j,t),$ z1(i,j,t)=r=1Nrαr(t)Ur(i,j). ${z}_{1}(i,j,t)=\sum\limits _{r=1}^{{N}_{r}}{\alpha }_{r}(t){U}_{r}(i,j).$ In this study, we independently constructed the emulators for J//, Σ xy , and Φ maps.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose the same parameters used during the discrete sampling in Section 2.1 (SYM-H index, AL index, IMF B z , and SW V x ) as input drivers with the addition of the SW density. The LSTM input structures are built following the process outlined in Section 2.2 of Licata and Mehta (2023).…”
Section: Dynamic Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10.1029/2023SW003706 In certain scenarios, true state outputs may not be accessible. In such cases, when conducting forecasts, predicted state outputs are utilized for forecasting future timesteps, following the approach outlined in Figure 3 of Licata and Mehta (2023). After predicting the current timestep t, the lookbacks are advanced for the subsequent timestep t + 1, with the corresponding lookback for t being updated with the predicted output.…”
Section: Space Weathermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation