2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.10.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced-order modeling through machine learning and graph-theoretic approaches for brittle fracture applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extensions to higher-strain rates and other modes of failure will be considered in our future works. Lastly, our method can be coupled with other machine learning and graph-based methods [92][93][94][95] for increased accuracy of failure paths prediction, which is our future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensions to higher-strain rates and other modes of failure will be considered in our future works. Lastly, our method can be coupled with other machine learning and graph-based methods [92][93][94][95] for increased accuracy of failure paths prediction, which is our future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rovinelli et al 15 built a Bayesian Network (BN) to identify an analytical relationship between crack propagation and its driving force, which focuses on predicting the direction of crack propagation instead of the detailed crack path. Hunter et al 16 applied an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) to approximately learn the dominant trends and effects that can determine the overall material response. Moore et al 17 implemented a Random Forest (RF) and a Decision Tree (DT) to predict the dominant fracture path within the material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fernández-Godino et al 19 used an RNN to bridge meso and continuum scales for accelerating predictions in a high strain rate application problem. One common issue with previous works 10, [16][17][18][19] is that the models are built on manually selected features such as fracture length, orientation, distance between fractures, etc., instead of features learned from the raw data. Manually selected features could reduce the computation requirement, but it might cause information loss and degrade model performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another interesting application of ML is to obtain a data-driven representation of free-energy potentials in the atomic scale and upscale it to a phase-field model using integrable deep neural networks (Teichert et al, 2019). Specifically for brittle failure, ML has been recently used to build surrogate models based on explicit crack representation (Hunter et al, 2019) and in failure prediction using a discrete crack representation model for high-fidelity simulations that feed an artificial neural networks (ANN) algorithm (Moore et al, 2018;Schwarzer et al, 2019). Nonetheless, the noted studies have only shown the applicability of ML in failure analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%