2020
DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1911793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Volume CT Screening in a Randomized Trial

Abstract: BackgroundThere are limited data from randomized trials regarding whether volume-based, low-dose computed tomographic (CT) screening can reduce lung-cancer mortality among male former and current smokers. MethodsA total of 13,195 men (primary analysis) and 2594 women (subgroup analyses) between the ages of 50 and 74 were randomly assigned to undergo CT screening at T0 (baseline), year 1, year 3, and year 5.5 or no screening. We obtained data on cancer diagnosis and the date and cause of death through linkages … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

25
1,493
5
60

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,953 publications
(1,583 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
25
1,493
5
60
Order By: Relevance
“…The NLST also supports evidence implied by the European screening trials that there is a sex difference in the benefit of LC screening in favour of females, which the NELSON trial could not fully address given most participants were male [7]. In addition, the German LUSI trial found that LDCT screening led to a statistically significant reduction in LC mortality among women (hazard ratio (HR) 0.31, p=0.04), but not among men (HR 0.94, p=0.81) [8].…”
Section: Commentarysupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The NLST also supports evidence implied by the European screening trials that there is a sex difference in the benefit of LC screening in favour of females, which the NELSON trial could not fully address given most participants were male [7]. In addition, the German LUSI trial found that LDCT screening led to a statistically significant reduction in LC mortality among women (hazard ratio (HR) 0.31, p=0.04), but not among men (HR 0.94, p=0.81) [8].…”
Section: Commentarysupporting
confidence: 53%
“…This study represents a timely and important update to the NLST data, alongside full results of the NELSON [7] and the LUSI trials [8], as Europe begins to set out a vision for LC screening. Although 10 years have passed since the publication of the first results of this landmark study, the USA still encounters the difficulties of implementation and the challenges of screening uptake by highrisk populations.…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in more than 20% of smokers suspicious lesions can be found by low-dose computed tomographic screening. Nevertheless, lung cancer was detected only in ~0.6% of screened smokers within a 10-year follow-up (The National Lung Screening Trial Research Team 2011; de Koning et al 2020). Similarly, around 33% of humans harbor precursor lesions in their pancreas but the life-time risk of developing pancreatic cancer is 1.6% (NCI Seer 2018; Makohon-Moore and Iacobuzio-Donahue 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 The results of a recent NELSON, large Dutch-Belgium lung cancer screening trial have shown the efficacy of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer. 7 The challenge now is to identify the target population in which screening will be acceptable and cost-effective. 8 Drugs to treat more advanced lung cancer, based on immunotherapy, are being trialled and yielding some promising results, in respect of increasing survival time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%