2021
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2021.1880572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced joint reaction and muscle forces with barefoot running

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with our study, previous research also found no significant differences in hip kinematics on initial contact and at peak values between running in conventional shoes and minimalist shoes [ 38 , 39 ]. Other studies have reported that, compared with conventional shoes, barefoot running decreased the contralateral pelvic drop, hip adduction, hip internal rotation, and hip joint reaction force [ 37 , 49 ]. These results indicated that altering shoe structure had less of an effect on the hip joint than removing running shoes and was not sufficient to affect the characteristic values of hip kinematics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In line with our study, previous research also found no significant differences in hip kinematics on initial contact and at peak values between running in conventional shoes and minimalist shoes [ 38 , 39 ]. Other studies have reported that, compared with conventional shoes, barefoot running decreased the contralateral pelvic drop, hip adduction, hip internal rotation, and hip joint reaction force [ 37 , 49 ]. These results indicated that altering shoe structure had less of an effect on the hip joint than removing running shoes and was not sufficient to affect the characteristic values of hip kinematics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite acknowledging that hip kinematics contribute to knee injuries, a lack of research exists regarding the influence of running shoes with and without drops on three−dimensional hip kinematics. One study demonstrated that running in conventional shoes increased the peak joint reaction force at the hip joint [ 37 ]; other studies showed no significant differences in the biomechanics of the hip joint while wearing conventional shoes with drops compared to minimalist shoes and being barefoot [ 38 , 39 ]. The different results of previous studies are likely due to using different kinds of running shoes with varying materials and constructions; additionally, different types of minimalist shoes induced different changes [ 40 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface electromyogram (EMG) wireless 32-channel system (Delsys, Boston, MA, USA) collected participants' muscle activities during the running phase. Muscle activity included vastus lateralis (VL), vastus medialis (VM), medial gastrocnemius (MG), lateral gastrocnemius (LG), soleus muscle (SL), flexor hallucis longus (FHL), and extensor digitorum longus (EDL) and were collected at a frequency of 1000 Hz [36]. Maximal voluntary contractions (MVC) of the muscles were performed for the normalization of muscle activity (0-100%) following a previously established protocol [37].…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systematic review study revealed a small effect between foot pronation and the risk of medial tibial stress syndrome, suggesting that foot pronation may not be directly associated with the foot injury ( Neal et al, 2014 ). Furthermore, a more recent radiologic study reported that significant ankle kinematic changes associated with supination of the foot were not related to the diagnosis of diseases ( Kim et al, 2019a ; Kim et al, 2021 ). This study interestingly observed that novice runners, who did not show ankle kinematic changes after mid-distance barefoot running, revealed early indications of cartilage degeneration or deteriorating effects by increasing the T2 relaxation time in MRI-derived T2 maps.…”
Section: Foot Morphology Shape and Posture In Running Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%