Reduced graphene oxide-based magnetic composite for trace determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in cosmetics by stir bar sorptive dispersive microextraction

Vállez-Gomis, Víctor; Grau, José; Benedé, Juan L.; Chisvert, Alberto; Salvador, Amparo

doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2020.461229

Cited by 33 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 47 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Liquid products (eau de toilettes and perfumes) are directly injected, without sample preparation, except dilution using different solvents or filtration [ 107 , 108 , 109 ] (if the amount of nonvolatile constituents is low when submitted to GC, as the performance of the GC system is rarely hampered by other constituents of the sample). If the analytes occur in more complex media, such as creams, lotions, foundations, and lipsticks, they need to be extracted from their matrix, prior to their analysis, via different established methods: by a fluid (in one step extraction technique [ 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 ] and improved variants such as MSPD: matrix solid-phase dispersion [ 23 , 93 , 114 , 115 ], QuEChERS (quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe extraction) [ 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 ], or energy-assisted extraction techniques: vortex-assisted extraction (VAE) [ 120 , 121 ], ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) [ 121 , 122 ], and pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) [ 121 , 123 ], by liquid–liquid extraction (LLE) techniques [ 120 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 ], by solid-phase extraction techniques (μSPE: micro solid-phase extraction, dSPE: dispersive solid-phase extraction; SBSE: stir bar sorptive extraction) [ 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 , 137 , 138 ], and gas-phase extraction (headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) [ 139 ,…”

Section: Ms Analysis Of Cosmetic Ingredientsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mass-Spectrometry-Based Research of Cosmetic Ingredients

Serb,

Georgescu,

Onulov

et al. 2024

Molecules

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cosmetic products are chemical substances or mixtures used on the skin, hair, nails, teeth, and the mucous membranes of the oral cavity, whose use is intended to clean, protect, correct body odor, perfume, keep in good condition, or change appearance. The analysis of cosmetic ingredients is often challenging because of their huge complexity and their adulteration. Among various analytical tools, mass spectrometry (MS) has been largely used for compound detection, ingredient screening, quality control, detection of product authenticity, and health risk evaluation. This work is focused on the MS applications in detecting and quantification of some common cosmetic ingredients, i.e., preservatives, dyes, heavy metals, allergens, and bioconjugates in various matrices (leave-on or rinse-off cosmetic products). As a global view, MS-based analysis of bioconjugates is a narrow field, and LC- and GC/GC×GC-MS are widely used for the investigation of preservatives, dyes, and fragrances, while inductively coupled plasma (ICP)-MS is ideal for comprehensive analysis of heavy metals. Ambient ionization approaches and advanced separation methods (i.e., convergence chromatography (UPC2)) coupled to MS have been proven to be an excellent choice for the analysis of scented allergens. At the same time, the current paper explores the challenges of MS-based analysis for cosmetic safety studies.

show abstract

Section: Ms Analysis Of Cosmetic Ingredientsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mass-Spectrometry-Based Research of Cosmetic Ingredients

Serb,

Georgescu,

Onulov

et al. 2024

Molecules

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It has been mainly applied to determine organic contaminants in the aquatic media [ 149 ]. Although it is a very recent technique, its use has been extended to cosmetics matrices using a hybrid magnetic composite made of CoFe 2 O 4 MNPs and MIL-101(Fe) MOF as a sorbent phase to analyse N-nitrosamines [ 137 ] and a magnetic carbonaceous composite made of CoFe 2 O 4 and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) to extract PAHs [ 138 ]. In both cases, satisfactory recoveries and precision were achieved, showing the use of SBSDME as a promising green microextraction technique.…”

Section: Sample Preparation Strategies For Cosmetics Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Recent Advances in Sample Preparation for Cosmetics and Personal Care Products Analysis

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The use of cosmetics and personal care products is increasing worldwide. Their high matrix complexity, together with the wide range of products currently marketed under different forms imply a challenge for their analysis, most of them requiring a sample pre-treatment step before analysis. Classical sample preparation methodologies involve large amounts of organic solvents as well as multiple steps resulting in large time consumption. Therefore, in recent years, the trends have been moved towards the development of simple, sustainable, and environmentally friendly methodologies in two ways: (i) the miniaturization of conventional procedures allowing a reduction in the consumption of solvents and reagents; and (ii) the development and application of sorbent- and liquid-based microextraction technologies to obtain a high analyte enrichment, avoiding or significantly reducing the use of organic solvents. This review provides an overview of analytical methodology during the last ten years, placing special emphasis on sample preparation to analyse cosmetics and personal care products. The use of liquid–liquid and solid–liquid extraction (LLE, SLE), ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), solid-phase extraction (SPE), pressurized liquid extraction (PLE), matrix solid-phase extraction (MSPD), and liquid- and sorbent-based microextraction techniques will be reviewed. The most recent advances and future trends including the development of new materials and green solvents will be also addressed.

show abstract

“…SBSE is commonly composed of a polydimethylsiloxane film, coated onto a glass jacket with an incorporated magnet core, in a cylindrical or disk shape [ 7 – 9 ]. The scientific community has recently introduced novel SBSE coatings to exploit more selective materials, such as molecularly imprinted polymers [ 10 , 11 ], metal organic frameworks [ 12 , 13 ], carbonaceous materials [ 14 , 15 ] and polymer monoliths [ 16 ]. However, the use of highly selective biomaterials such as antibodies (Abs) [ 17 ] or aptamers [ 18 , 19 ] has been only occasionally used.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

3D printed spinning cup-shaped device for immunoaffinity solid-phase extraction of diclofenac in wastewaters

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article reports current research efforts towards designing bespoke microscale extraction approaches exploiting the versatility of 3D printing for fast prototyping of novel geometries of sorptive devices. This is demonstrated via the so-called 3D printed spinning cup-based platform for immunoextraction of emerging contaminants using diclofenac as a model analyte. A new format of rotating cylindrical scaffold (containing a semispherical upper cavity) with enhanced coverage of biorecognition elements, and providing elevated enhancement factors with no need of eluate processing as compared with other microextraction stirring units is proposed. Two distinct synthetic routes capitalized upon modification of the acrylate surface of stereolithographic 3D printed parts with hexamethylenediamine or branched polyethyleneimine chemistries were assayed for covalent binding of monoclonal diclofenac antibody.Under the optimized experimental conditions, a LOD of 108 ng L−1 diclofenac, dynamic linear range of 0.4–1,500 µg L–1, and enrichment factors > 83 (for near-exhaustive extraction) were obtained using liquid chromatography coupled with UV–Vis detection. The feasibility of the antibody-laden device for handling of complex samples was demonstrated with the analysis of raw influent wastewaters with relative recoveries ranging from 102 to 109%. By exploiting stereolithographic 3D printing, up to 36 midget devices were fabricated in a single run with an estimated cost of mere 0.68 euros per 3D print and up to 16 €/device after the incorporation of the monoclonal antibody. Graphical abstract

show abstract

Reduced graphene oxide-based magnetic composite for trace determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in cosmetics by stir bar sorptive dispersive microextraction

Cited by 33 publications

References 47 publications

Mass-Spectrometry-Based Research of Cosmetic Ingredients

Mass-Spectrometry-Based Research of Cosmetic Ingredients

Recent Advances in Sample Preparation for Cosmetics and Personal Care Products Analysis

3D printed spinning cup-shaped device for immunoaffinity solid-phase extraction of diclofenac in wastewaters

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About