Reduced exposure evaluation of an Electrically Heated Cigarette Smoking System. Part 2: Smoke chemistry and in vitro toxicological evaluation using smoking regimens reflecting human puffing behavior
Abstract:Chemical analysis of up to 49 harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHC) in mainstream smoke, in vitro cytotoxicity of the particulate and gas/vapor phase of mainstream smoke determined in the Neutral Red Uptake assay, and in vitro bacterial mutagenicity of the particulate phase determined in the Salmonella typhimurium Reverse Mutation (Ames) assay are reported for three Electrically Heated Cigarette Smoking System (EHCSS) series-K cigarettes, the University of Kentucky Reference Cigarette 2R4F, and a… Show more
“…The ISO yields as declared on the cigarette packaging were as follows: Marlboro (M6UK; 6 mg tar, 0.5 mg nicotine, and 7.0 mg CO), Philip Morris One (PM1; 1 mg tar, 0.1 mg nicotine, and 2.0 mg CO), and EHCSS-K6 (5 mg tar, 0.3 mg nicotine, and 0.6 mg CO). Mainstream smoke was also analyzed for 44 additional HPHC according to ISO conditions plus 15 experimental smoking regimens reflecting 'human puffing behavior' (Zenzen et al, 2012). The data used represent a subset of the data set reported by Zenzen et al (2012) to illustrate the principle of the 'nicotine bridging' method.…”
Section: Smoking Protocols and Test And Comparator Cigarettesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This concept is used to evaluate HPHC-to-nicotine and in vitro toxicity-to-nicotine relationships for 2 conventional cigarettes (Marlboro, Philip Morris One) (M6UK, PM1) and the EHCSS-K6 smoked according to ISO and 15 different machine-smoking regimens to reflect 'human puffing behavior' Zenzen et al, 2012). Human smoking behavior was determined using nicotine uptake distributions derived from nicotine metabolite excretion data obtained in two clinical studies Lindner et al, 2011).…”
A modeling approach termed 'nicotine bridging' is presented to estimate exposure to mainstream smoke constituents. The method is based on: (1) determination of harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHC) and in vitro toxicity parameter-to-nicotine regressions obtained using multiple machine-smoking protocols, (2) nicotine uptake distributions determined from 24-h excretion of nicotine metabolites in a clinical study, and (3) modeled HPHC uptake distributions using steps 1 and 2. An example of 'nicotine bridging' is provided, using a subset of the data reported in Part 2 of this supplement (Zenzen et al., 2012) for two conventional lit-end cigarettes (CC) and the Electrically Heated Cigarette Smoking System (EHCSS) series-K6 cigarette. The bridging method provides justified extrapolations of HPHC exposure distributions that cannot be obtained for smoke constituents due to the lack of specific biomarkers of exposure to cigarette smoke constituents in clinical evaluations. Using this modeling approach, exposure reduction is evident when the HPHC exposure distribution curves between the MRTP and the CC users are substantially separated with little or no overlap between the distribution curves.
“…The ISO yields as declared on the cigarette packaging were as follows: Marlboro (M6UK; 6 mg tar, 0.5 mg nicotine, and 7.0 mg CO), Philip Morris One (PM1; 1 mg tar, 0.1 mg nicotine, and 2.0 mg CO), and EHCSS-K6 (5 mg tar, 0.3 mg nicotine, and 0.6 mg CO). Mainstream smoke was also analyzed for 44 additional HPHC according to ISO conditions plus 15 experimental smoking regimens reflecting 'human puffing behavior' (Zenzen et al, 2012). The data used represent a subset of the data set reported by Zenzen et al (2012) to illustrate the principle of the 'nicotine bridging' method.…”
Section: Smoking Protocols and Test And Comparator Cigarettesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This concept is used to evaluate HPHC-to-nicotine and in vitro toxicity-to-nicotine relationships for 2 conventional cigarettes (Marlboro, Philip Morris One) (M6UK, PM1) and the EHCSS-K6 smoked according to ISO and 15 different machine-smoking regimens to reflect 'human puffing behavior' Zenzen et al, 2012). Human smoking behavior was determined using nicotine uptake distributions derived from nicotine metabolite excretion data obtained in two clinical studies Lindner et al, 2011).…”
A modeling approach termed 'nicotine bridging' is presented to estimate exposure to mainstream smoke constituents. The method is based on: (1) determination of harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHC) and in vitro toxicity parameter-to-nicotine regressions obtained using multiple machine-smoking protocols, (2) nicotine uptake distributions determined from 24-h excretion of nicotine metabolites in a clinical study, and (3) modeled HPHC uptake distributions using steps 1 and 2. An example of 'nicotine bridging' is provided, using a subset of the data reported in Part 2 of this supplement (Zenzen et al., 2012) for two conventional lit-end cigarettes (CC) and the Electrically Heated Cigarette Smoking System (EHCSS) series-K6 cigarette. The bridging method provides justified extrapolations of HPHC exposure distributions that cannot be obtained for smoke constituents due to the lack of specific biomarkers of exposure to cigarette smoke constituents in clinical evaluations. Using this modeling approach, exposure reduction is evident when the HPHC exposure distribution curves between the MRTP and the CC users are substantially separated with little or no overlap between the distribution curves.
“…Strain TA98 detects frame shift mutations, and strain TA100 detects base-pair substitution at guanine-cytosine base pairs, while strain TA102 detects certain oxidizing mutagens, cross-linking agents, and hydrazines (Zenzen et al 2012). The numbers of revertants seen in these three strains are listed in Table 2.…”
Hazardous particulates and volatiles produced by incense burning accumulate in the indoor atmosphere, where they pose a health risk, entering the human body via the respiratory system. Yet, few studies have focused on the effects of the total particulate matter from incense burning on human health. Here, we evaluate the health risks associated with the total particulate matter generated from burning incense indoors for the first time. The total particulate matter and major chemical components of two types of incense smoke were characterized using an electrical low pressure impactor and gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. Their genotoxicity and cytotoxicity were compared with mainstream tobacco smoke using in vitro assays. Our results show that both the particulate number and mass of incense smoke were dominated by ultrafine to fine particles. In addition, many aromatic, irritant, and toxic compounds were identified in the particulate fraction. In vitro assessments showed that the genotoxicity of the particulate matter from one particular incense sample was higher than the reference cigarette sample with the same dose. All particulate matter fractions from the incense investigated were found to possess greater cytotoxicity on Chinese hamster ovary cells than smoke from the reference cigarette. Collective assessment of these data will affect the evaluation of incense products and facilitate measures to reduce exposure to their smoke. Clearly, there needs to be greater awareness and management of the health risks associated with burning incense in indoor environments.
“…The electrically heated cigarette smoking system (EHCSS) and EHCSS cigarette produces reduced levels of a wide range of toxicologically important cigarette smoke HPHC and significantly lowers the biological activity of mainstream smoke compared to conventional lit-end cigarettes in laboratory-based test systems (Werley et al, 2008;Zenzen et al, 2012). Electrical heating of the tobacco reduces pyrolysis, and produces smoke that contains lower amounts of most cigarette smoke HPHC.…”
A randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel-group, single-center study to determine biomarkers of exposure to twelve selected harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs) in cigarette smoke and urinary excretion of mutagenic material in 128 male and female Japanese subjects smoking Marlboro cigarettes (6 mg tar, 0.5mg nicotine, and 7.0mg CO) at baseline. Subjects were randomized to continue smoking Marlboro cigarettes, or switch to the Electrically Heated Cigarette Smoking System (EHCSS) and smoke either the EHCSS-K6 (5mg tar, 0.3mg nicotine, and 0.6 mg CO) or the EHCSS-K3 (3mg tar, 0.2mg nicotine, and 0.6 mg CO) cigarette, or switch to smoking Lark One cigarettes (1mg tar, 0.1mg nicotine, and 2.0mg CO), or to no-smoking. The mean decreases from baseline to Day 8 were statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) for all cigarette smoke HPHC including CO (the primary objective) and excretion of mutagenic material in the EHCSS-K6 (range: -14.6% to -75.6%) and EHCSS-K3 (range: -9.8% to -73.0%) groups. Statistically significant reductions (all p ≤ 0.05) in exposure to ten cigarette smoke HPHC (range: -5.9% to -34.6%), but not urinary mutagenicity, were observed in the Lark One group. The largest mean reductions in exposure to HPHC (all p ≤ 0.01 level) occurred in the no-smoking group (range: -13.7% to -97.6%).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.