2014 IEEE 15th Workshop on Control and Modeling for Power Electronics (COMPEL) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/compel.2014.6877125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced Dynamic Model of The Alternate Arm Converter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study assumes that the controller has been designed according to such design criteria and thus no harmonic current is circulating in the arms. The power exchanged with the top stack can be thus written as in (10). From the power equation (10b), the energy deviation of the positive arm can be derived (11).…”
Section: A Case Of the MMCmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study assumes that the controller has been designed according to such design criteria and thus no harmonic current is circulating in the arms. The power exchanged with the top stack can be thus written as in (10). From the power equation (10b), the energy deviation of the positive arm can be derived (11).…”
Section: A Case Of the MMCmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the AAC is capable of blocking the flow of current from the AC-side to the DC-side during a DC-side fault thanks to its stacks of full bridge cells and can even be operated as a STATCOM [9] during an outage of the DC bus. A reduced dnamic model of the AAC is presented in [10]. The AAC has also been used in DC-DC converter arrangements [11], [12] and it has been shown [13] that the AAC exhibits better thermal balance between its IGBT modules than the MMC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During 2α, the expressions for i g_ac and i cir are depicted in (12) and (13), respectively. Moreover, (16) and (17) express i upper_arm and i lower_arm in terms of i g_ac and i cir , respectively…”
Section: Zcs Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to this feature, the maximum voltage generated by each arm is half of the DC terminal voltage, which is approximately half compared with the MMC [13]. Therefore, the AAC requires lower number of cells; hence, the size and losses of the AAC are lower compared with the MMC [13,17]. The major advantages of the AAC include the number of SMs or cells per arm is greatly reduced (∼50% compared with the MMC) and the ability to block DC-side faults, as well as to ride through AC-side faults in each SM as mentioned in [12,13,[18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results in [29], [31], [32] were obtained using a full-switching simulation model and the main contributions in [31] and [30] were verified using a hardware prototype. In [13], an arm-level averaged model for the Alternate Arm Converter (AAC) was tested for dc-side fault response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%