Previously, we showed that adenosine A 2A receptor-induces relaxation independent of NO in soluble epoxide hydrolase-null mice (Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 304: R23-R32, 2013). Currently, we hypothesize that Ephx2-gene deletion affects acetylcholine (Ach)-induced relaxation which is independent of A 2A AR but dependent on NO and CYP-epoxygenases. Ephx2 −/− aortas showed a lack of sEH (97.1%, p<0.05) but an increase in microsomal epoxide hydrolase (mEH, 37%, p<0.05) proteins compared to C57Bl/6 mice, and no change in CYP2C29 and CYP2J protein (p>0.05). Ach-induced response was tested with nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) NO-inhibitor; 10 −4 M, N-(methylsulfonyl)-2-(2-propynyloxy)-benzenehexanamide (MS-PPOH) (CYP-epoxygenase inhibitor; 10 −5 M), 14,15-epoxyeicosa-5(Z)-enoic acid (14,15-EEZE, an epoxyeicosatrienoic acid-antagonist; 10 −5 M), SCH-58261 (A 2A AR-antagonist; 10 −6 M) and angiotensin-II (Ang-II, 10 −6 M). In Ephx2 −/− mice, Ach-induced relaxation was not different from C57Bl/6 mice except at 10 −5 M (92.75 ± 2.41 vs. 76.12 ± 3.34, P<0.05). However, Achinduced relaxation was blocked by L-NAME (Ephx2 −/− : 23.74 ± 3.76% and C57Bl/6: 11.61 ± 2.82%), MS-PPOH (Ephx2 −/− : 48.16 ± 6.53% and C57Bl/6: 52.27 ± 7.47%) and 14,15-EEZE (Ephx2 −/− : 44.29 ± 8.33% and C57Bl/6: 39.27 ± 7.47%) vs. non-treated (P<0.05). But, it did not block by SCH-58261 (Ephx2 −/− : 68.75 ± 11.41% and C57Bl/6: 66.26 ± 9.43%, P >0.05) vs. nontreated (P>0.05). Interestingly, Ang-II attenuates less relaxation in Ehx2 −/− vs. C57Bl/6 mice (58.80 ± 7.81% vs. 45.92 ± 7.76, P <0.05). Our data suggests that Ach-induced relaxation in