2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2011.09.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced configuration set for the multi-step method applied to machine and probe error separation on a CMM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite having this measuring range, they achieve their optimal performance only when operating with very low deflections. Moreover, these probes are primarily designed for CMM applications [3,4], resulting in a lack of specific calibration procedures out of the machine [5,6]. Furthermore, regarding their internal architecture, these probes often constrain three of their degrees of freedom while measuring the displacement on the other three.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite having this measuring range, they achieve their optimal performance only when operating with very low deflections. Moreover, these probes are primarily designed for CMM applications [3,4], resulting in a lack of specific calibration procedures out of the machine [5,6]. Furthermore, regarding their internal architecture, these probes often constrain three of their degrees of freedom while measuring the displacement on the other three.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gao et al [8,9] proposed a new pretravel quantitative calibration method on the basis of analyzing the cause of the pretravel, which could improve the on-machine measurement accuracy using touch trigger probe. Nafi et al [10,11] studied an error separation method based on multistep redundancy method, in which the errors of the measurement machine tool, standard ball, probe, and probe tip producing in the measurement process are separated from calibration results by multistep measuring. Shih and Chen [12] proposed free-form flank correction in helical gear grinding using a five-axis computer numerical control gear profile grinding machine, but the errors of the actual tooth surface were assessed using the gear measurement centre, not on-machine measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wozniak et al [23–26] calculate the probe error using a high resolution transducer and a rotary table that simulated the CMM measurement. Nafi et al [29] proposed a procedure to obtain probe errors by measuring a calibration sphere. Pereira et al [30] improved the dynamic error of scanning probes by modelling the structure of the probe and measuring its error with a transducer on the part.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%