2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00068-019-01200-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced complication rates for unstable trochanteric fractures managed with third-generation nails: Gamma 3 nail versus PFNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The forest plot of four outcomes indicated the two studied devices had no statistically significant difference. Eleven studies [7,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] included a total of 1,146 patients concerned with mechanical failure rates, the quality of the evidence was moderate, as some articles [7,22,25] have a small sample size and there is a risk of bias (Figure 4). No significant differences were found in helical blade versus lag screw (OR=0.71, 95% CI 0.40-1.27, p=0.22; Figure 5).…”
Section: Effects Of Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The forest plot of four outcomes indicated the two studied devices had no statistically significant difference. Eleven studies [7,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] included a total of 1,146 patients concerned with mechanical failure rates, the quality of the evidence was moderate, as some articles [7,22,25] have a small sample size and there is a risk of bias (Figure 4). No significant differences were found in helical blade versus lag screw (OR=0.71, 95% CI 0.40-1.27, p=0.22; Figure 5).…”
Section: Effects Of Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Random-effect model was used to explore heterogeneity, I 2 =23%, and no statistically significant heterogeneity was found between these studies. Additionally, five of the studies [20][21][22][23][24] included a total of 642 patients concerned with the quality of reduction, the quality of the evidence was moderate, due to the exited inconsistency about the evaluation of reduction criteria (Figure 6). The excellent and good rate of fracture reduction was no significantly different between the helical blade and lag screw (OR=1.33, 95% CI 0.61-2.90, p=0.48; Figure 7).…”
Section: Effects Of Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Osteosintezė intrameduline vinimi dažnai yra pagrindinė priemonė, užtikrinanti stabilią kaulo fiksaciją, ankstyvą galimybę minti operuota koja, ypač esant sudėtingiems, nestabiliems lūžiams. Sudėtingų tarpgūbrinės srities lūžių sintezė siejama su dažnomis mechaninė- [4,5]. Darbo tikslas -pristatyti ypač retą intraoperacinę komplikaciją -kelio sąnario penetraciją šlaunikaulio diafizės skeveldra intramedulinės osteosintezės metu.…”
Section: įVadasunclassified
“…Over the past decade, intramedullary nailing (IMN) has become the preferred treatment method in tibial, femoral shaft, and sub-or intertrochanteric fractures [1][2][3][4]. Despite good results, a number of complications are described: rotational and axial malalignment, shortening of the limb, intraoperative fracture, hardware breakage, joint penetration by guidewire or nail, malunion, nonunion, infection, and neurovascular damage [5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%