1991
DOI: 10.1086/285266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced Aggression Toward Siblings as Evidence of Kin Recognition in Cannibalistic Salamanders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
39
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, repeated studies on the same species sometimes yield apparently contradictory findings. A. opacum larvae are less aggressive toward siblings than non-siblings when both are similar in size (Walls and Roudebush 1991), yet preferentially cannibalize smaller siblings (Walls and Blaustein 1995). Many factors, including larval stage (this study), larval density (Kishida et al 2015), presence of other species (Pomerory 1981;Pfennig 1990;Michimae and Wakahara 2002), size differences among individuals (Brunkow and Collins 1998), and possibly the risk of disease transmission (Pfennig et al 1991;see below), affect the social dynamics of salamander cannibalism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, repeated studies on the same species sometimes yield apparently contradictory findings. A. opacum larvae are less aggressive toward siblings than non-siblings when both are similar in size (Walls and Roudebush 1991), yet preferentially cannibalize smaller siblings (Walls and Blaustein 1995). Many factors, including larval stage (this study), larval density (Kishida et al 2015), presence of other species (Pomerory 1981;Pfennig 1990;Michimae and Wakahara 2002), size differences among individuals (Brunkow and Collins 1998), and possibly the risk of disease transmission (Pfennig et al 1991;see below), affect the social dynamics of salamander cannibalism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…However, cannibalism also incurs costs. Cannibals may be injured when struggling with prey, they risk contracting infectious disease by eating conspecifics (Pfennig et al 1998), and they may suffer decreased inclusive fitness if they eat their kin (Walls and Roudebush 1991;Pfennig et al , 1994. Nonetheless, kin cannibalism may evolve in certain circumstances, for example, when the cannibalized individuals have little chance of metamorphosing themselves before their pond dries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mechanisms which allow individuals to differentially respond towards others based on their likely degree of relatedness include spatial distribution (such as sex-biased dispersal), social familiarity, phenotype matching, or recognition alleles (reviewed in Komdeur and Hatchwell 1999). Kin selection has been widely demonstrated in contexts such as predator evasion (Sherman 1977), colony defence and propagation in eusocial insects (Queller and Strassman 1998), parental care (Shields 1984), and selective cannibalism (Walls and Roudebush 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kin recognition has been identified in a wide variety of organisms, including many amphibians (reviewed in Fletcher andMichener 1987, Sherman et al 1997). Studies of kin recognition in amphibians have often examined it in the context of cannibalism (Walls and Roudebush 1991, Pfennig and Collins 1993. Cannibalism, or the killing and ingestion of conspecifics, is widespread in nature (Polis 1981, Elgar andCrespi 1992) and is found in many groups of amphibians, with the most frequent type being that of larvae Resumo Discriminação de relativos em girinos canibais de Dendrobates auratus (Anura, Dendrobatidae).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%