2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.108140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced 2D form coherence and 3D structure from motion sensitivity in developmental dyscalculia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, impairments in various domain-general executive functions, such as working memory, attention, and cognitive control has been reported in individuals with DD, even when manipulating non-numerical material ( Askenazi and Henik, 2010 , Szűcs et al, 2013 , Szűcs, 2016 ). Moreover, other studies found non-numerical impairments in individuals with DD even in very basic aspects of visual scene perception, such as lower symmetry and form perception sensitivity and enhanced visual crowding ( Szűcs et al, 2013 , Castaldi et al, 2020 , Castaldi et al, 2022 ). The current results are the first reporting that impairments in individuals with DD can extend also to categorization of non-numerical auditory stimuli, further reinforcing a more comprehensive view of DD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…For example, impairments in various domain-general executive functions, such as working memory, attention, and cognitive control has been reported in individuals with DD, even when manipulating non-numerical material ( Askenazi and Henik, 2010 , Szűcs et al, 2013 , Szűcs, 2016 ). Moreover, other studies found non-numerical impairments in individuals with DD even in very basic aspects of visual scene perception, such as lower symmetry and form perception sensitivity and enhanced visual crowding ( Szűcs et al, 2013 , Castaldi et al, 2020 , Castaldi et al, 2022 ). The current results are the first reporting that impairments in individuals with DD can extend also to categorization of non-numerical auditory stimuli, further reinforcing a more comprehensive view of DD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Our findings from Experiments 1–3 showing improved performance (higher accuracy and faster RTs) for shape compared to random configurations and also when the number of elements matched the number of shape vertices (i.e., 3 elements on a triangle compared to 4, 5, or 6 elements on a triangle) provide additional support for the idea that numerosity estimation around the subitizing range is facilitated by a shape-template matching mechanism which takes into account the relationship between points of maximum curvature or vertices [ 26 ]. Further support for this idea comes from a recent study showing that sensitivity to visual form (static Glass patterns) correlated with numerical abilities in individuals with developmental dyscalculia [ 30 ]. One might note that in Experiment 1 (colour), the effect of shape configuration (shape vs. random) for the triangle condition only was not found statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their findings indicate that shape coding precedes numerosity estimation, which implies that numerosity estimation around the subitizing range is facilitated by a shape-template matching process which takes into account the relationship between points of maximum curvature (or vertices). This idea received further support from studies showing that sensitivity to visual form (Glass patterns) can predict numerical abilities [ 30 ]. Previous studies of shape processing have shown that an inconsistency in local features, such as luminance polarity and orientation of elements that make up a shape, strongly disrupts the encoding of global shape for long straight lines [ 31 ], curves [ 32 , 33 ], radial-frequency patterns [ 34 , 35 ] and Glass patterns [ 36 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Evidence suggests that symmetric arrays of dots are underestimated compared to non-symmetric patterns of equal numerosity (Apthorp & Bell, 2015;Maldonado Moscoso, Anobile, Burr, Arrighi, & Castaldi, 2022), although the mechanism explaining this underestimation is still debated (see Discussion section). Additionally, a recent study reported that sensitivity to global visual form (static Glass patterns) is lower in individuals with developmental dyscalculia (Castaldi, Turi, Cicchini, Gassama, & Eger, 2022). However, while there is abundant evidence that spatial grouping cues bias ANS, little evidence is present in the literature about non-spatial grouping cues, such as grouping by similarity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%