2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2011.12.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redox potential-driven repeated batch ethanol fermentation under very-high-gravity conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also important to note that there were no residual glucose left at each cycle for all sets of experiments. These conclusions were agreed with previous publications related to yeast metabolism [3,9]. …”
Section: Reproducibility Of Dco 2 -Driven Repeated Batch Fermentationsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is also important to note that there were no residual glucose left at each cycle for all sets of experiments. These conclusions were agreed with previous publications related to yeast metabolism [3,9]. …”
Section: Reproducibility Of Dco 2 -Driven Repeated Batch Fermentationsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…As similar as former redox-potential driven repeated batch system [3], the dCO 2 self-regulated repeated batch system settled after 3-4 cycles and the resulted were presented in Table 1. Results suggested that final biomass concentration under dCO 2 control was much higher than that of no control case.…”
Section: Reproducibility Of Dco 2 -Driven Repeated Batch Fermentationsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To appreciate how implementation of a self-cycling strategy could potentially impact annual ethanol production goals at large scale, we compared SCF with batch in terms of annual ethanol productivity, which represents the ethanol produced per year ( P , ton/year). Feng et al determined the annual fermentation operation time ( t annual ) for an ethanol plant to be 7920 h (330 days) [ 21 ]. For a reactor with a working volume ( V ) of 10 5 L, downtime between cycles was estimated at 6.0 h ( t d-batch ) and 0.25 h for batch and SCF methodology, respectively [ 21 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that SCF has been applied to many microbial fermentation systems, the majority of them were operated under aerobic conditions [7][8][9]11]. In fact, only two research groups examined the operation of SCF under anaerobic conditions [12][13][14]-investigating microbial degradation of nitrate species in the former and ethanol production by yeast in the latter. In both cases, the researchers attempted to use oxidation-reduction potential as a monitoring parameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%