1997
DOI: 10.1021/la9700432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redox-Induced Orientation Change of a Self-Assembled Monolayer of 11-Ferrocenyl-1-undecanethiol on a Gold Electrode Studied by in Situ FT-IRRAS

Abstract: The potential dependent structure change of a self-assembled monolayer of 11-ferrocenyl-1-undecanethiol (FcC11SH) on a gold electrode surface during the redox reaction of the terminal ferrocene group was investigated in 0.1 M HClO4 solution by electrochemical in situ Fourier transform infrared reflection absorption spectroscopy (FT-IRRAS). A number of bands were observed in the 3200−1200 cm-1 region with p-polarization measurement, but no band was observed by s-polarization measurement when the potential was k… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

18
178
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(197 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(105 reference statements)
18
178
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to this interpretation, the hydrophilic carboxylate heads would reorient the hydrocarbon chain of the chemisorbed thiols by pulling them towards the solution. It should be pointed out that similar potential-induced reorientations have been proposed by Uosaki et al [27] and Burgess et al [28] to account for the changes brought into the IR spectrum of electroactive SAMs upon oxidizing their redox moieties. To obtain potentiostatic titration curves of the same monolayer under equilibrium conditions, we used as a reference the (nearly) neutral monolayer in contact with an acid solution of pH * 3.4 [29], and varied both potential and pH * according to the sequence illustrated in Figure 2.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…According to this interpretation, the hydrophilic carboxylate heads would reorient the hydrocarbon chain of the chemisorbed thiols by pulling them towards the solution. It should be pointed out that similar potential-induced reorientations have been proposed by Uosaki et al [27] and Burgess et al [28] to account for the changes brought into the IR spectrum of electroactive SAMs upon oxidizing their redox moieties. To obtain potentiostatic titration curves of the same monolayer under equilibrium conditions, we used as a reference the (nearly) neutral monolayer in contact with an acid solution of pH * 3.4 [29], and varied both potential and pH * according to the sequence illustrated in Figure 2.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…7 Finally, oxidation of the Fc moieties results in an orientational change which in turn results in a monolayer film thickness increase. 8 Although these studies have provided significant insight into the structure and electron-transfer processes of Fc-terminated SAMs there are still important issues to be resolved. Particularly, it is important to determine the electronic structure including work function changes induced by the electroactive SAMs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ye et al attributed the increase in thickness to changes in tilt angles of alkyl chains caused by oxidation of the terminal ferrocenyl group. 8 Viana et al claimed that conformational change of the terminal ferrocenyl group is dominant for the thickness change.…”
Section: Structure Of Ion Pairing Upon Oxidation Of Ferrocenyl Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] The terminal Fc groups exhibit a definite redox reaction whose dependences on electrolyte solution and alkyl chain length have been studied mainly by cyclic voltammetry (CV). On the other hand, several in situ techniques including infrared reflection adsorption spectroscopy (IRRAS), [6][7][8][9] quartz crystal microbalance (QCM), 9-11 ellipsometry 12,13 and subtractively normalized interfacial Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (SNIFTIRS), 14 have been employed to elucidate property changes of the Fc-terminated SAMs caused by oxidation and reduction of the monolayer. Despite the simplicity of the reaction itself, the reaction changes several properties of the layer including layer thickness, refractive index and hydrophilicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%