Efficient renaturation of urea-denatured rhodanese using the chaperonin GroE system requires GroEL, GroES, and ATP. At high concentrations this renaturation also requires the substrate thiosulfate to have been present during GroEL-rhodanese complex formation. When thiosulfate is present the GroEL-rhodanese complex can be concentrated to greater than 1 mg/ml rhodanese with little effect on the efficiency of renaturation. However, if complex is formed in the absence of thiosulfate, renaturation of rhodanese in the presence of thiosulfate shows a critical concentration of approximately 0.4 mg/ml, above which renaturation yields drop dramatically. This critical concentration appears to be related to an aggregation event in the refolding of rhodanese. The nucleotide free or ADP-bound form of GroEL also binds to rhodanese that has been either already renatured or never denatured. The bound rhodanese has no activity but can be released from GroEL with ATP recovering 90% of control activity. The data presented herein support a release and rebinding mechanism for the GroE-assisted refolding of rhodanese. It also suggests GroEL binds several protein folding intermediates along the entire refolding pathway.In vivo, molecular chaperones such as hsp70/hsp40 and the chaperonins prevent the accumulation of inappropriate protein aggregates and enhance the acquisition of native protein structure. For instance in Escherichia coli, chaperonins are known to bind to a host of partially folded proteins (1, 2) and act in concert with the upstream (hsp70/40) molecular chaperones (3, 4) to prevent misfolding and aggregation. While the mechanism through which this is accomplished has been the subject of intense research, it is still unclear exactly how chaperones assist protein folding.The most thoroughly studied chaperonin system is the GroE proteins (GroEL and GroES) isolated from E. coli. Results from in vitro protein folding experiments indicate that the GroE chaperonins inhibit protein misfolding and aggregation (5-7). Two models have been proposed to explain this observation. The first model suggests that the GroE system sequesters the folding protein inside a cavity of the GroEL chaperonin and allows the protein to fold in a shielded environment through repeated ATP-dependent release and rebinding reactions (7, 10, 11). The second model suggests that the protein is released from GroEL and folds free in solution but will rebind to the chaperonin if it is not committed to fold to the native state. In this latter model, protein aggregation is prevented by decreasing the concentration of free, aggregation-prone, folding intermediates.