1990
DOI: 10.1021/ic00329a033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redox conduction in electropolymerized films of transition-metal complexes of osmium, ruthenium, iron, and cobalt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results contrast to those reported using GaP semiconductors with thicker polymer coatings (on the order of ≈10 nm) ,,,, where the V oc instead decreases following pyridyl group modification of the GaP surface. We speculate that this is in part due to a larger resistance and poorer ion conductivity associated with the thicker organic coatings . Nonetheless, although the V oc of the PPy|GaP and CoTTP|PPy|GaP electrodes is similar, the fill factor (ff) of the JV response under illumination nearly doubles following treatment with CoTTP, moving from 0.21 ± 0.08 for unfunctionalized GaP to 0.23 ± 0.07 for PPy|GaP, and further increasing to 0.39 ± 0.07 for CoTTP|PPy|GaP (Figure S15 and Table S2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These results contrast to those reported using GaP semiconductors with thicker polymer coatings (on the order of ≈10 nm) ,,,, where the V oc instead decreases following pyridyl group modification of the GaP surface. We speculate that this is in part due to a larger resistance and poorer ion conductivity associated with the thicker organic coatings . Nonetheless, although the V oc of the PPy|GaP and CoTTP|PPy|GaP electrodes is similar, the fill factor (ff) of the JV response under illumination nearly doubles following treatment with CoTTP, moving from 0.21 ± 0.08 for unfunctionalized GaP to 0.23 ± 0.07 for PPy|GaP, and further increasing to 0.39 ± 0.07 for CoTTP|PPy|GaP (Figure S15 and Table S2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The diameters of anions of the supporting electrolytes amount to, respectively, 0.333, 0.435, and 0.720 nm [19]. The polymers were formed at optimum potentials for the duration of 20 min in solutions containing 1 × 10 -3 M of the initial complex and 0.1 M of the supporting electrolyte.…”
Section: Effect Of Anions Of the Supporting Electrolytementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship of the number of moles of diffusing solvent on the type of electrolyte may be related to the size of anions. The BF 4 − ion was the smallest among the investigated anions (ion diameter BF 4 − = 0.334 nm [ 46 ]). The other ions, in the presence of which mass transport takes place to a greater extent, had larger sizes (ion diameters 0.370 and 0.435 nm for ClO 4 − and PF 6 − , respectively [ 46 ]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%