2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redox conditions across the G–L boundary in South China: Evidence from pyrite morphology and sulfur isotopic compositions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
57
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
4
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the formation mechanism of pyrite framboids, the pyrite framboids can be used as an indicator of paleoredox conditions [13][14][15][16][17]38,60]. Syngenetic framboids will not grow after pyrites are precipitated from the water and deposited in the sediments [13,66].…”
Section: Pyrite Morphology As An Indicator Of Paleoredox Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on the formation mechanism of pyrite framboids, the pyrite framboids can be used as an indicator of paleoredox conditions [13][14][15][16][17]38,60]. Syngenetic framboids will not grow after pyrites are precipitated from the water and deposited in the sediments [13,66].…”
Section: Pyrite Morphology As An Indicator Of Paleoredox Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process results in the size of the early diagenetic framboids being large and variable. Hence, the framboids' mean size and standard deviation/skewness values of the populations can be used to estimate the paleoredox conditions in the water body [13][14][15]37,38].…”
Section: Pyrite Morphology As An Indicator Of Paleoredox Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Framboids developed under euxinic conditions are generally small, with a narrow size range (4.3 -6.1 µm), while diagenetic framboids developed in sediments underlying oxic-dysoxic water column are larger (5.7 -11.9 µm) with a wider size range (Wilkin et al, 1996). Therefore, framboids in the studied sediments, with diameters ranging between 4 and 30 m and a mean value of 12 m, could have been formed in sediments underlying oxic-dysoxic water column (Wilkin et al, 1996, Wei et al, 2016. Pyrite framboids formation would require the presence of reactive Fe 2+ and H 2 S, both likely provided by the activity of Fe reducing bacteria and SRB in anoxic conditions (Canfield 1989, Wilkin andBarnes, 1997), being SO 4 = availability a limiting factor in fresh water environments (Davidson et al, 1985;Marnette et al, 1993).…”
Section: Type I and Ii Aggregatesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Taking into account the largest and the smallest measured diameter in the studied case, Type I and II framboids would be constituted by approximately 10 3 to 30 x 10 3 crystals, which is the range of NM showed by framboids in modern sediments (Wilkin et al, 1996). Size distribution of pyrite framboids is considered to be an indicator of the environmental conditions under which they were formed (Wilkin et al, 1996;Wignall and Newton, 1998;Wei et al, 2016). Framboids developed under euxinic conditions are generally small, with a narrow size range (4.3 -6.1 µm), while diagenetic framboids developed in sediments underlying oxic-dysoxic water column are larger (5.7 -11.9 µm) with a wider size range (Wilkin et al, 1996).…”
Section: Type I and Ii Aggregatesmentioning
confidence: 97%