2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0926-3373(00)00138-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redox behavior of CeO2–ZrO2 mixed oxides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
60
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 227 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
11
60
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…6, two TPR peaks were observed for both GT and CP samples with Ce content of 70-90 mol%, while only the low temperature peak(s) was present for the samples in lower Ce content region. Similar results were reported previously [25,38]. Fornasiero et al…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…6, two TPR peaks were observed for both GT and CP samples with Ce content of 70-90 mol%, while only the low temperature peak(s) was present for the samples in lower Ce content region. Similar results were reported previously [25,38]. Fornasiero et al…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Pure CeO 2 presents two main signals that have been widely described for such oxide. The initial occurrence of the low temperature signal (centered at 470 °C in our case) is due to the surface reduction of Ce 4+ cations into Ce 3+ , while the high temperature signal (with maximum at 754 °C) is associated to Ce 4+ to Ce 3+ reduction in the bulk [8,29,30,56,57].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…An inadequate discussion of some nuances in explaining the results of reducibility may result in controversial discussions about the enhancement or detriment of the reducibility in Ce-Zr mixed oxides depending on the loading of Zr, as was pointed out by Vidal et al [56]. Nevertheless, most authors claim a beneficial effect in the ceria reducibility by the addition of Zr because of the increasing of the population of surface Ce 4+ reducible cations, even if the maximum temperature of the low temperature reduction becomes higher than for the pure CeO 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These peaks are related to the CeO 2 reduction in a solid Ce-ZrO 2 solution, which happened at a lower temperature than the reduction temperature observed for pure CeO 2 . 18 The TPR profile (Figure 2) for the 1.5%Rh/g-Al 2 O 3 catalyst showed a peak at 154 °C, which may be attributed to the reduction of Rh 2 O 3 . 19,20 The profile for the 1.5%Rh/CeO 2 catalyst showed peaks at 96, 224 and 967 °C.…”
Section: Catalyst Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 95%