1956
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.103.620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redetermination of the Hyperfine Splitting in the Ground State of Atomic Hydrogen

Abstract: A redetermination has been made of the zero-field hyperfine splitting of the ground state of atomic hydrogen. A microwave absorption technique was used employing a resonance line with a width of about 3 kc/sec. This width (occasionally as narrow as TV of the normal Doppler breadth) was obtained through the mechanism of collision reduction of the Doppler effect. The primary relaxation mechanism was electron exchange between hydrogen atoms. The measured result for the hyperfine splitting is Av= 1420.40580 ±0.000… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0
4

Year Published

1958
1958
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 287 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
54
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because during an elastic collision the spacings between energy levels for the colliding counterparts change as a result of short-range interaction forces. After a number of such collisions, each acting like a random perturbation, the molecule can lose coherence with the interacting radiation field (Wittke & Dicke 1956). Elastic collisions are normally more frequent than inelastic collisions, and the mean time between elastic collisions usually sets the timescale of collisional dephasing/relaxation T c and the corresponding condition t < T D c is required to allow the build-up of coherent interactions.…”
Section: Requirements For Superradiancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because during an elastic collision the spacings between energy levels for the colliding counterparts change as a result of short-range interaction forces. After a number of such collisions, each acting like a random perturbation, the molecule can lose coherence with the interacting radiation field (Wittke & Dicke 1956). Elastic collisions are normally more frequent than inelastic collisions, and the mean time between elastic collisions usually sets the timescale of collisional dephasing/relaxation T c and the corresponding condition t < T D c is required to allow the build-up of coherent interactions.…”
Section: Requirements For Superradiancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…and is seen to give just the negative of the above values. It seems remarkable that only the differences in initial populations between the states (1,-i) and (1,1) and between the states (2,-2) and (2,2) contribute to the final result.…”
Section: =-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the spherical symmetry of S-states one would not at first expect to see any splitting produced by the interaction between the magnetic moments of the electron and the nucleus, for which the interaction Hamiltonian is _A However, an additional term must be added to this Hamiltonian, the so-called contact interaction term, re * (2) and it is this which contributes the magnetic hyperfine splitting in S states, for which the wave function does not vanish at the origin:…”
Section: Contact Interaction Termmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This conclusion suggests that the problem of collision-narrowing can be separated into two distinct parts: (a) As a result of the oscillator's motion, the stochas-1.. C. Camparo and R. P. Frueholtz, unpublished. 2 Experiments are now in progress at The Aerospace Corporation and Duke University to test the validity of this hypothesis. tically varying Doppler shifts (i.e., discrete frequency jumps) give rise to a nonmonochromatic electromagnetic-field power spectral density in the oscillator's rest frame.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%