1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf02165077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redetermination of several half-lives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The t 1/2 determination of 101 Tc has been the topic of many studies as shown in Table 1 38 – 40 . The presently accepted value for the t 1/2 of 101 Tc is 14.22(1) min, which most closely resembles that determined by Abouzi et al, i.e., 14.224 ± 0.008 min 41 . However, more recent measurements have highlighted discrepancies in this value, and the measured t 1/2 of 101 Tc, which was free from 101 Mo during the measurement, was 14.02 ± 0.01 min 42 .…”
Section: Nuclear Propertiessupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The t 1/2 determination of 101 Tc has been the topic of many studies as shown in Table 1 38 – 40 . The presently accepted value for the t 1/2 of 101 Tc is 14.22(1) min, which most closely resembles that determined by Abouzi et al, i.e., 14.224 ± 0.008 min 41 . However, more recent measurements have highlighted discrepancies in this value, and the measured t 1/2 of 101 Tc, which was free from 101 Mo during the measurement, was 14.02 ± 0.01 min 42 .…”
Section: Nuclear Propertiessupporting
confidence: 86%
“… Year Performed Half-life, t 1/2 (min) Detector Production route Ref. 1940 9.0 ± 1 N/A 100 Mo(n,γ) 101 Mo; 101 Mo → 101 Tc Sagane 20 1941 14.0 N/A N/A Maurer 17 1942 14.0 N/A U fission; 101 Mo → 101 Tc Hahn 19 1948 14.5 GM tube 102 Ru(γ,p) 101 Tc Perlman 38 1948 16.5 ± 0.5 GM tube 102 Ru(γ,p) 101 Tc Mock 39 1953 15.0 GM tube 101 Ru(n,p) 101 Tc Paul 68 1954 14.3 ± 0.1 GM tube 100 Mo(n,γ) 101 Mo; 101 Mo → 101 Tc Wiles 34 1957 14.0 ± 0.1 NaI 101 Mo → 101 Tc O’Kelley 32 1960 15 ± 3 Proportional counter 103 Rh(n, 3 He) 101 Tc Kumabe 40 1990 14.22 ± 0.008 HPGe 100 Mo(n,γ) 101 Mo; 101 Mo → 101 Tc Abzouzi 41 2008 14.02 ± 0.1 HPGe 100 Mo(n,γ) 101 Mo; 101 Mo → 101 Tc You 42 ...…”
Section: Nuclear Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that there is a 13 sigma discrepancy between the two recent most precise measurements [9,10], calling into question at least one of the quoted uncertainties. In such cases the Particle Data Group [12] recommends a procedure for scaling the uncertainty.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The paper published in 1990 [2] report the presently recommended 122 Sb half-life value together with the half-life of 41 Ar, 80m Br, 94m Nb, 101 Mo, 101 Tc, 109 Pd, 109m Pd, 122m Sb, 123m Sn, 152m Eu and 239 Np. The authors did not describe the experiments nor the elaboration of the collected data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here and hereafter uncertainties in parentheses are standard uncertainties (k = 1). A literature review revealed that the recommended t 1/2 ( 122 Sb) value is based on the most recent result of an inconsistent dataset published in 1990 [2] without reporting details on the experiment nor the uncertainty budget which are compulsory to support the claimed 10 -4 relative standard uncertainty level [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%