Redesigning the way teams work smarter using comprehensive assessment of team member effectiveness (CATME)

Mahmood, Aisha; Choudhary, Meenakshi; Qurashi, Aleena Hasan

doi:10.1109/picmet.2016.7806768

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Individual and Team Development Learning Activity Support1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2020

2023

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Other1

Book1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent4

Authors

Journals

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…CATME tools provide limited assistance in this regard in the feedback provided to students and tools available to instructors. Mahmood, Choudhary, and Qurashi (2016) concluded that CATME requires instructor supervision and active involvement to resolve conflicts. Adams, DeGraaff, and Hohnor (2015) observed (that) their students were unable to sufficiently interpret the peer feedback, and student reactions to the feedback ranged from complete dismissal to an inability to integrate the feedback into their performance and to improve their behaviours/skills.…”

Section: Individual and Team Development Learning Activity Supportmentioning

confidence: 99%

CATME or ITP Metrics? Which One Should I Use for Design Team Development and Assessment?

Jamieson

Shaw

2018 ASEE Annual Conference &Amp; Exposition Proceedings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

and holds a M.Sc. in Chemical Engineering Education. Her current research focuses on the application of blended and active learning to design teaching and learning, student assessment, and continuous course improvement techniques. She managed and was a key contributor to a two-year pilot project to introduce Blended Learning into Engineering Capstone Design Courses, and is a co-author with John M. Shaw on a number of recent journal, book, and conference contributions on engineering design education.

show abstract

Section: Individual and Team Development Learning Activity Supportmentioning

confidence: 99%