2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-00669-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redesigning an antibody H3 loop by virtual screening of a small library of human germline-derived sequences

Abstract: The design of superior biologic therapeutics, including antibodies and engineered proteins, involves optimizing their specific ability to bind to disease-related molecular targets. Previously, we developed and applied the Assisted Design of Antibody and Protein Therapeutics (ADAPT) platform for virtual affinity maturation of antibodies (Vivcharuk et al. in PLoS One 12(7):e0181490, 10.1371/journal.pone.0181490, 2017). However, ADAPT is limited to point mutations of hot-spot residues in existing CDR loops. In th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, a similar NOAC apixaban is much more rigid and compact, making it easier to be described, but at the same time, it may lose some possibility to bind FXa in alternative patterns as RIV, which may partially explain its lower binding affinity in some mutants, as discussed earlier ( Qu et al, 2019 ). From this example, we would again emphasize the recognition of the important influence of the flexibility of both the target protein and the drug molecule, which was often neglected in structure-based drug design and screening using static crystal structures but more and more considered in recent studies, especially in protein and antibody design ( Corbeil et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, a similar NOAC apixaban is much more rigid and compact, making it easier to be described, but at the same time, it may lose some possibility to bind FXa in alternative patterns as RIV, which may partially explain its lower binding affinity in some mutants, as discussed earlier ( Qu et al, 2019 ). From this example, we would again emphasize the recognition of the important influence of the flexibility of both the target protein and the drug molecule, which was often neglected in structure-based drug design and screening using static crystal structures but more and more considered in recent studies, especially in protein and antibody design ( Corbeil et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, deep sequencing explorations can help determine the representation of distinct Ab library features associated with antigen interactions. These observations can then be analyzed via computational models to determine Abantigen interactions and molecular docking predictions, ultimately enabling a holistic approach to big data assessments [68,69]. Moreover, such in silico predictive models can offer valuable insights to improve the designs of affinity maturation libraries.…”
Section: Enhanced Affinity Maturation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For biologics, 5 internal publications yielded 150 antibody mutants with both predicted and experimental binding affinities relative to the respective parental antibodies ( Vivcharuk et al, 2017 ; Sulea et al, 2018 ; Zwaagstra et al, 2019 ; Sulea et al, 2020 ; Corbeil et al, 2021 ). When compared to the published results for small molecules, the quantitative prediction of relative binding affinity for antibodies is not as successful (S = 0.58, MUE = 0.90 kcal/mol).…”
Section: Sie In the Wildmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the low correlation observed, these predictions still proved useful ( Section 4.3 ). In Corbeil et al (2021) a mutational engineering endeavor was undertaken by attempting to redesign the entire CDR H3 loop of an antibody. The requirement of predicting the protein loop backbone conformation significantly increased affinity prediction errors.…”
Section: Sie In the Wildmentioning
confidence: 99%