1989
DOI: 10.2216/i0031-8884-28-2-206.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redescription of Alexandrium minutum Halim (Dinophyceae) type species of the genus Alexandrium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
59
1
6

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
13
59
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Gonyaulax parva was described with the identical main tabulation: 4 0 , 3a, 6 00 , 6 000 , 1p, 1 0000 , but plate 1p can be equally well regarded as the first antapical plate. This would be in accordance with the interpretation by Balech (1989) of the hypothecal tabulation of Alexandrium, a member of the Gonyaulacales. The cingular and sulcal plates of G. parva have not been described or depicted in detail but it does not belong to the genus Gonyaulax as presently defined.…”
Section: Morphological Comparison At the Species Levelsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Gonyaulax parva was described with the identical main tabulation: 4 0 , 3a, 6 00 , 6 000 , 1p, 1 0000 , but plate 1p can be equally well regarded as the first antapical plate. This would be in accordance with the interpretation by Balech (1989) of the hypothecal tabulation of Alexandrium, a member of the Gonyaulacales. The cingular and sulcal plates of G. parva have not been described or depicted in detail but it does not belong to the genus Gonyaulax as presently defined.…”
Section: Morphological Comparison At the Species Levelsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, this trait may not be phylogenetically significant. Franco et al (1995) observed seven strains of A. minutum and A. lusitanicum in culture and found that the variation in the s.a. was as great within a single culture as between A. minutum and A. lusitanicum according to the species descnptions (Balech, , 1989. There was also no difference between the morpho species based upon toxin profiles or growth behavior.…”
Section: Morphology Vs Molecular Systematicsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The presence of a ventral pore in the 1 st apical ( 1 ') plate clearly distinguishes the Anakoha Bay and Croisilles Harbour isolates from A. angustitabulatum which lacks this feature (Balech 1995), and from A. andersoni because of the difference in the form of the 6th precingular (6") and anterior sulcal (s.a.) plates (Balech 1990). Designation of these isolates as either^, minutum Halim (Balech 1989), or A. lusitanicum Balech (Balech 1985) is however more problematic because the New Zealand cells have features which are illustrated as characteristics of both. The fact that 1 ' is wide, is regularly truncated on the anterior and posterior margins and is directly connected to the apical pore plate (Po) are all features that are defined as typical of A. lusitanicum (Balech 1995).…”
Section: Taxonomic Designationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that 1 ' is wide, is regularly truncated on the anterior and posterior margins and is directly connected to the apical pore plate (Po) are all features that are defined as typical of A. lusitanicum (Balech 1995). On the other hand, the shape of 6" and the variation in the shape of s.a., which Balech (1989) considered to be the main distinguishing feature (notably wider than long in A. lusitanicum) confounds this designation. Balech (1995) himself expresses the view that the differences between A minutum and A. lusitanicum are so small that the species independence is doubtful.…”
Section: Taxonomic Designationmentioning
confidence: 99%