2019
DOI: 10.3390/rel10080486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redemption of ‘Fallen’ Hero-Athletes: Lance Armstrong, Isaiah, and Doing Good while Being Bad

Abstract: Lance Armstrong’s achievements in cycling will forever be overshadowed by his admittance of using unethical performance enhancing means to win. However, Armstrong’s positive social impact of raising awareness, hundreds of millions of dollars, and support for the cancer community are undeniably noteworthy. Clearly, Armstrong’s hero-savior athlete depiction in the media prior to his ‘fall’ was related to the social ‘good’ he was equally known for. This good stands in stark contrast to his demonization since. Thi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Media coverage following the interview was critical of Armstong's performance; in general, analysts were not satisfied with his apology. Sports scholar Andrew Meyer conjectured that Armstrong's status as a cancer survivor with a successful charitable organization made the news of his rule violations feel like a significant betrayal for those who had turned to him for hope (Meyer 2019). In Thomsen and Anderson's analysis, Armstrong's confession failed because he evaded personal responsibility.…”
Section: Lance Armstrongmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Media coverage following the interview was critical of Armstong's performance; in general, analysts were not satisfied with his apology. Sports scholar Andrew Meyer conjectured that Armstrong's status as a cancer survivor with a successful charitable organization made the news of his rule violations feel like a significant betrayal for those who had turned to him for hope (Meyer 2019). In Thomsen and Anderson's analysis, Armstrong's confession failed because he evaded personal responsibility.…”
Section: Lance Armstrongmentioning
confidence: 99%