2014
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.13.11659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redefining Normal Facial Nerve Enhancement: Healthy Subject Comparison of Typical Enhancement Patterns—Unenhanced and Contrast-Enhanced Spin-Echo Versus 3D Inversion Recovery–Prepared Fast Spoiled Gradient-Echo Imaging

Abstract: Significantly greater SI is observed in most facial nerve segments on both unenhanced and contrast-enhanced IR-FSPGR among healthy subjects and may be misinterpreted as pathologic when evaluated in the context of existing enhancement paradigms. Examiners should remain cognizant of normal deviations from expected enhancement patterns in IR-FSPGR imaging to avoid misdiagnosis and other interpretive pitfalls.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was most difficult to depict the facial nerve in the labyrinthine segment on both T1‐VISTA and T1‐FFE. This difficulty could contribute to the previously reported low rate of the Gd‐enhancement in the labyrinthine segment on 3D‐SPGR at 3.0T MRI, despite the relatively high signal intensity on 3D inversion recovery‐prepared fast spoiled gradient‐echo (IR‐FSPGR) compared to that with a fat‐saturated 2D‐SE sequence (at 1.5T MRI) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It was most difficult to depict the facial nerve in the labyrinthine segment on both T1‐VISTA and T1‐FFE. This difficulty could contribute to the previously reported low rate of the Gd‐enhancement in the labyrinthine segment on 3D‐SPGR at 3.0T MRI, despite the relatively high signal intensity on 3D inversion recovery‐prepared fast spoiled gradient‐echo (IR‐FSPGR) compared to that with a fat‐saturated 2D‐SE sequence (at 1.5T MRI) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 1.5T MRI study with 3D IR‐FSPGR as a 3D‐T1WI sequence showed a significantly greater signal intensity of the normal facial nerve than that acquired with fat‐saturated 2D‐SE in most segments on both pre‐ and post‐Gd‐enhanced images. This result was due to the higher spatial resolution of 3D IR‐FSPGR than that of the fat‐saturated 2D‐SE sequence . The greater intrinsic signal intensity of the facial nerve with 3D IR‐FSPGR could be misinterpreted as pathological Gd‐enhancement without complementary pre‐Gd‐enhanced images …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations