2019
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1811513116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redefining bilingualism as a spectrum of experiences that differentially affects brain structure and function

Abstract: SignificanceThis study sheds new light on the neuroanatomical adaptations resulting from bilingual language exposure and use, providing crucial insights into untangling the variability of findings in the existing literature. Our results demonstrate that differences in bilingual language experiences confer a range of systematic outcomes in terms of brain/mind adaptations. In doing so, our findings strongly support a shift away from traditional designs with bilingual vs. monolingual comparisons and toward an app… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
262
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 271 publications
(295 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
22
262
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers can apply objective measures for bilingualism (Clare et al, 2016;Estanga et al, 2017), rather than asking participants or family members to self-report language status (Alladi et al, 2013;Chertkow et al, 2010). Formal assessments of second language proficiency while treating the degree of bilingualism as a continuous variable (DeLuca, Rothman, Bialystok, & Pliatsikas, 2019;Laine & Lehtonen, 2018;Luk & Bialystok, 2013) should be applied. Authors have recently developed questionnaires to quantify participants' language profiles on a continuum (Anderson et al, 2018) and to measure language proficiency, dominance, as well as immersion (Li et al, 2019).…”
Section: Suggestions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers can apply objective measures for bilingualism (Clare et al, 2016;Estanga et al, 2017), rather than asking participants or family members to self-report language status (Alladi et al, 2013;Chertkow et al, 2010). Formal assessments of second language proficiency while treating the degree of bilingualism as a continuous variable (DeLuca, Rothman, Bialystok, & Pliatsikas, 2019;Laine & Lehtonen, 2018;Luk & Bialystok, 2013) should be applied. Authors have recently developed questionnaires to quantify participants' language profiles on a continuum (Anderson et al, 2018) and to measure language proficiency, dominance, as well as immersion (Li et al, 2019).…”
Section: Suggestions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the probable AD patients showed a "bilingual advantage" in the expression of Alzheimer's clinical syndrome. Bilingualism could increase cognitive reserve through the constant management of two simultaneously active and competing languages [13,40,[45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57]. Better reserve, with better compensation or masking of worsening cognition, could explain the worse dementia severity as per MMSE scores on presentation for bilinguals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DeLuca et al. () tested longer‐term neuroanatomical effects of language use in already immersed bilinguals. They reported volumetric increases in the cerebellum, which were positively correlated with the amount of prior immersion, accompanied by subcortical restructuring and increases in diffusivity in the forceps minor (an anterior extension of the corpus callosum connecting it to the frontal lobes).…”
Section: Moving Forward: Examining the (Long‐term) Effects Of Individmentioning
confidence: 99%