2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41409-020-0803-y
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redefining and measuring transplant conditioning intensity in current era: a study in acute myeloid leukemia patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
90
1
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
90
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Such protocols are believed to be associated with similar anti-leukemic effect but better tolerability as compared to standard protocols as busulfan and cyclophosphamide or cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation, 19 and should be regarded as protocols with intermediate intensity, sharing both MAC and RIC features, as shown by a recent study. 33 Globally, the findings of the present analysis emphasize the strong predictive power of KPS score in AML patients undergoing allo-SCT; furthermore, they shed new light on its impact on clinical practice. First, a reduced performance status should not be considered per-se a major obstacle in performing a transplant in a patient with AML in CR1.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such protocols are believed to be associated with similar anti-leukemic effect but better tolerability as compared to standard protocols as busulfan and cyclophosphamide or cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation, 19 and should be regarded as protocols with intermediate intensity, sharing both MAC and RIC features, as shown by a recent study. 33 Globally, the findings of the present analysis emphasize the strong predictive power of KPS score in AML patients undergoing allo-SCT; furthermore, they shed new light on its impact on clinical practice. First, a reduced performance status should not be considered per-se a major obstacle in performing a transplant in a patient with AML in CR1.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Indeed, a significant proportion of the patients included in our study received modern myeloablative regimens as fludarabine combined with an alkylator at myeloablative dosage, commonly referred to as “reduced toxicity regimens”. Such protocols are believed to be associated with similar anti‐leukemic effect but better tolerability as compared to standard protocols as busulfan and cyclophosphamide or cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation, 19 and should be regarded as protocols with intermediate intensity, sharing both MAC and RIC features, as shown by a recent study 33 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The composite endpoint GRFS was defined as survival without the following events: stage III–IV aGVHD, severe cGVHD, disease relapse, or death from any cause after SCT [ 14 ]. Myeloablative conditioning (MAC) was defined as a regimen containing either total body irradiation (TBI) with a dose > 6 Gray, a total dose of oral busulfan > 8 mg/kg, or a total dose of intravenous busulfan > 6.4 mg/kg [ 15 ]. All other regimen intensities were defined as reported by the centers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of any deviation from a typical clinical course, BM biopsy was scheduled earlier at the discretion of the treating physician. Cytogenetics, remission status prior to transplant, conditioning intensity, and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) were defined as previously described [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 23 , 24 , 39 ]. Regarding response evaluation after relapse, no complete hematologic recovery was required for definition of complete remission (CR), as cytopenia might be related to other factors than the underlying disease, for example GvHD or viral infections.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%