2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

REDD+ in Indonesia: A new mode of governance or just another project?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past these rural communities had limited rights, and relationships with forest managers have been, at times, confrontational [6,8]. However, in response to both internal and external political pressure, in 1989 the Indonesian government launched its first social forestry program, starting an ongoing process to move to more equitable forest governance systems [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the past these rural communities had limited rights, and relationships with forest managers have been, at times, confrontational [6,8]. However, in response to both internal and external political pressure, in 1989 the Indonesian government launched its first social forestry program, starting an ongoing process to move to more equitable forest governance systems [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In pine-coffee agroforestry systems, forest managers often prioritize the production of forest products and the maintenance of forest cover, potentially leading to sub-optimal conditions for coffee production, and whilst coffee quality can benefit from being grown under shade, farmers may not have the knowledge or resources needed to optimize coffee production. Combined, these factors can make achieving economic coffee yields within an agroforestry system challenging [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such powerful actors and alliances dominate the frontier dynamics, undermine local agency, and depoliticise forests by rendering the problem of deforestation a technical one (Li 2007 ; Peluso and Vandergeest 2020 ). Case 1 in particular highlights these processes, with analysis from Indonesia showing how forest-based mitigation was initially linked to large political change but is now reduced to a technical project (Moeliono et al 2020 ), or in Brazil, where interests in keeping forest standing has been shifted over time towards restoration interests linked to intensified biomass production (Gebara et al 2020 ). Simultaneously to these power relations of domination and oppression, visible in all cases presented in this paper, power struggles take place within localities, among farmers and herders struggling over access to resources and between state and citizens with diverse and conflicting visions of future development (cases 2 and 3).…”
Section: Results: Four Cases On Adaptation Mitigation and Development In Forest Frontiers Over Time: A 4i Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus far, these coalitions for change are not yet sufficiently powerful nor vocal enough to overcome BAU and its echo chambers (Brockhaus et al 2014a , b ). Fall-backs into comfort zones of established (and profitable) power relations put at risk efforts for any lasting change (Barr et al 2010 ; Moeliono et al 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another method to understand relations is to ask stakeholders how close their relationship is to other stakeholders where 'close' needs to be defined together. Using a simple 1-5 score the results can be drawn in a spider diagram (for more details see Moeliono et al 2020).…”
Section: Diagnostic Tools 661 Stakeholder Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%