2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11842-020-09432-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

REDD+ as a Vehicle for Community-Based Forest Management? Critical Insights from Vietnam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It includes keywords such as reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation program (REDD+) (3), Chittagong hill tracts (2), income (2), etc. Bayrak and Marafa (2020) and Dawson et al (2018) explore the national policy processes through REDD+ policy framework and suggest features to upgrade the policy to make it more effective. One method is to influence the localization of international rules in order to promote more equal routes and prevent deforestation and damage.…”
Section: Keyword Co-occurrence and Thematic Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It includes keywords such as reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation program (REDD+) (3), Chittagong hill tracts (2), income (2), etc. Bayrak and Marafa (2020) and Dawson et al (2018) explore the national policy processes through REDD+ policy framework and suggest features to upgrade the policy to make it more effective. One method is to influence the localization of international rules in order to promote more equal routes and prevent deforestation and damage.…”
Section: Keyword Co-occurrence and Thematic Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, community-based forest management is a common approach in several nations [7], such as India [8], Tanzania [9], Bangladesh [10], Ethiopia [11], the Philippines [12], Argentina [13], Kenya [14], Nepal [15], and Vietnam [16]. Community forestry is implemented through a number of strategies that integrate the roles of community, government, and private stakeholders [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%