Speaking of Jesus 1999
DOI: 10.1163/9789004267381_020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redaction, Contextualization and the Sayings of Jesus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Formgeschichte is a very problematic venture, but one can no longer analyse the gospels as if Formgeschichte does not exist. Redaction criticism, in terms of establishing textual communication, was a failure, but it is still the best explanation for many characteristics of the data about Jesus according to Vorster (1980;1982a;1982b;. Vorster forced us to sharpen our methodological awareness: to move beyond a mere rejection or an uncritical repetition of conventional analytical tools.…”
Section: Willem S Vorstermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formgeschichte is a very problematic venture, but one can no longer analyse the gospels as if Formgeschichte does not exist. Redaction criticism, in terms of establishing textual communication, was a failure, but it is still the best explanation for many characteristics of the data about Jesus according to Vorster (1980;1982a;1982b;. Vorster forced us to sharpen our methodological awareness: to move beyond a mere rejection or an uncritical repetition of conventional analytical tools.…”
Section: Willem S Vorstermentioning
confidence: 99%