2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10164-008-0098-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) use rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) scent marks as territorial marking sites

Abstract: One of the functions of chemical communication is territorial signalling. To achieve this, animals should mark their territories in a manner that increases the detectability of the marks, thereby maximising the probability that other animals detect the scent marks. In this study, we focused on the scent-marking behaviour of red foxes in relation to the abundance of their main prey, the European rabbit, in a suburban forest in Madrid, Spain. Our results reveal that foxes scent-marked more and increased the dete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of nutrient‐demanding species on the burrows can be explained by the confounding effect of the changes in the amount of soil nutrients and the high availability of open microsites around the burrows. The nutrient content of the soil might be changed by the excrement of the foxes and also by taking deeper soil layers to the surface of the kurgan (Kurek et al., ; Monclús et al., ). In contrast with grasslands on flat areas where the deeper soil layers (bedrock) generally contain less nutrients and humus, on kurgans the deeper layers have a relatively high nutrient and humus content (Deák, Tóthmérész et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of nutrient‐demanding species on the burrows can be explained by the confounding effect of the changes in the amount of soil nutrients and the high availability of open microsites around the burrows. The nutrient content of the soil might be changed by the excrement of the foxes and also by taking deeper soil layers to the surface of the kurgan (Kurek et al., ; Monclús et al., ). In contrast with grasslands on flat areas where the deeper soil layers (bedrock) generally contain less nutrients and humus, on kurgans the deeper layers have a relatively high nutrient and humus content (Deák, Tóthmérész et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scats morphologically classified as red fox had the highest probability of being correctly identified, whereas those classified as belonging to European wildcat had the least chance of being correctly identified. The high abundances and marking behaviour may be responsible for the high detection rates of red fox scats (Cavallini, 1994;Monclús et al, 2008;Monterroso et al, 2011) and, hence, a higher probability of a given scat being from red fox.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduced response in the plot with experienced animals (unfenced plot) could be explained by the fact that the control warrens were not an ideal control because predator scats were naturally occurring nearby. This is not unexpected because fox scent marks were more common in areas of higher rabbit density (Monclús et al 2009). Thus, the natural presence of odour in both treatment and control warrens in the unfenced plot could reduce the effect of the treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%