2009
DOI: 10.4314/gjass.v8i1.48518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Red, far red wavelength, the ratio red to far red, temperature and vegetation at a secondary forest regrowth and under the crowns of three plantation tree species at Umudike, Nigeria.

Abstract: Measurements of temperature, red, far red wavelength of light and the ratio red to far red were made at every 10 minutes interval at marked points along a 15 m transect using thermometers and a Skye 660/730 Radiation Detector and Measuring unit (SKR100: SKR110) at Umudike, Nigeria. Readings were made during the dry and wet seasons under the forest floor of a secondary forest regrowth, under the crowns of Treculia africana, Dacryodes edulis, Irvingia gabonensis and in a 1-year old abandonded farmland. Readings … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Where studies have compared plant growth response to neutral and filtered light, (Mitchell and Woodward, 1988;Turnbull, 1991), the upper limit of R:FRs used in these trials was in most cases greater than 1.2. However, the range of R:FRs found in the forest understorey and gaps lies between 0.03 and 1.12 (Smith, 1982;Ross et al, 1986) and between 1.7 and 1.8 under a secondary forest regrowth (Dike, 2009) and therefore most of the experiments that have been conducted are of little practical applicability. The influence of R:FR on the leaf water status of forest tree seedlings has implications for seedling tolerance to shade as well as the ability to adjust to elevated light levels associated with forest disturbance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where studies have compared plant growth response to neutral and filtered light, (Mitchell and Woodward, 1988;Turnbull, 1991), the upper limit of R:FRs used in these trials was in most cases greater than 1.2. However, the range of R:FRs found in the forest understorey and gaps lies between 0.03 and 1.12 (Smith, 1982;Ross et al, 1986) and between 1.7 and 1.8 under a secondary forest regrowth (Dike, 2009) and therefore most of the experiments that have been conducted are of little practical applicability. The influence of R:FR on the leaf water status of forest tree seedlings has implications for seedling tolerance to shade as well as the ability to adjust to elevated light levels associated with forest disturbance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%