1995
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0684.1995.tb00182.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Red cell polymorphisms in nonhuman primates: A review

Abstract: Development as well as current status of the knowledge of nonhuman primate blood groups are discussed together with some practical implications of the red cell antigen polymorphisms in anthropoid apes, Old and New World monkeys and prosimians. Recent data on molecular biology and genetics throw light on the relationships among simian and human red cell antigens and their evolutionary pathways.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Erythrocyte typing for Le a or Le b by direct hemagglutination, as done for humans (22) was not useful; 12 of 13 animals tested (including animals A and D) were negative for both determinants. These results agree with findings in M. mulatta (W. Socha, personal communication), indicating that direct hemagglutination does not allow detection of rhesus monkey erythrocyte Le antigens or ABO-blood group antigens (55). We then tested for Le a or Le b antigens in saliva and gastric juice by a hemagglutination inhibition method (45).…”
Section: Lewis Determination In Host Secretionssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Erythrocyte typing for Le a or Le b by direct hemagglutination, as done for humans (22) was not useful; 12 of 13 animals tested (including animals A and D) were negative for both determinants. These results agree with findings in M. mulatta (W. Socha, personal communication), indicating that direct hemagglutination does not allow detection of rhesus monkey erythrocyte Le antigens or ABO-blood group antigens (55). We then tested for Le a or Le b antigens in saliva and gastric juice by a hemagglutination inhibition method (45).…”
Section: Lewis Determination In Host Secretionssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Initial experiments confirmed that RBC ABO epitopes were not present in sufficient quantity to be detected by forward grouping 13 . Instead, the presence of antibodies to A and B antigens in both the donor and the recipient monkey established a common type O blood group (data not shown).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Blood group compatibility was determined with reverse typing 12,13 . Serum samples from the donor and eligible recipients were tested for antibodies to A and B antigens with standardized human red blood cells (RBC) reagents (Dominion Biologicals Ltd, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, studies on blood group polymorphisms indicate that bonobos ( N < 10) are virtually monomorphic for four major blood groups compared with considerable variation in chimpanzees ( Moor‐Jankowski et al . 1972, 1975 ; Socha et al . 1995 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%