2021
DOI: 10.1080/09637486.2021.1993797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Red and processed meat consumption and risk of incident cardiovascular disease and mortality: Isfahan cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, a meta-analysis of 17 prospective cohort studies provides evidence showing that high consumption of total red meat and processed meat is associated with an increased risk of CVD mortality [77]. The data from the Isfahan Cohort Study show that red meat and red plus processed meat intake are positively linked with CVD mortality, but inversely associated with stroke risk [80]. In a large prospective Health Professionals Follow-up Study cohort, a greater intake of total, processed, and unprocessed red meat is found to be associated with a higher risk of CHD [81].…”
Section: Red Meat and Processed Meatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, a meta-analysis of 17 prospective cohort studies provides evidence showing that high consumption of total red meat and processed meat is associated with an increased risk of CVD mortality [77]. The data from the Isfahan Cohort Study show that red meat and red plus processed meat intake are positively linked with CVD mortality, but inversely associated with stroke risk [80]. In a large prospective Health Professionals Follow-up Study cohort, a greater intake of total, processed, and unprocessed red meat is found to be associated with a higher risk of CHD [81].…”
Section: Red Meat and Processed Meatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that the associations of food intake levels with overall and causespecific mortality found in the EPIC-Heidelberg cohort, contrasting as they were for differ-ent main sources of animal protein, are mostly in line with findings from other prospective studies. Although differences in the time period, study population, type of dietary assessment tools used, or covariate adjustments may have led to heterogeneity across prospective studies worldwide, meta-analyses showed mostly higher risks of overall cardiovascular and cancer-related mortality in relation to red meat or processed meat intake and lower risks in relation to consumption levels of poultry, cheese or milk [19][20][21][23][24][25][26][43][44][45], even though findings for dairy products have been more diverse across different studies [27][28][29]. We found that most of the associations disappeared after considering mortality endpoints grouped by their known relationships with smoking, alcohol intake, and adiposity and when careful adjustments were made for the latter risk factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, potential contradictions also appear when examining mortality risk in association with consumption levels for individual food sources for animal protein. Here, studies have generally reported increased risks of all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer-related mortality in relation to higher intakes of red and processed meat [18][19][20][21][22], whereas mostly inverse risk relationships have been found for consumption of poultry [20,23,24] or dairy products [25,26], with some degree of heterogeneity across different studies, particularly, for the association of dairy intake with all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality [27][28][29]. These heterogeneous findings across main food groups contributing to animal protein intake raise the question of whether animal protein itself, as a nutrient, is a genuine cause contributing to higher mortality risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%