2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-11015-4_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RED: A Simple but Effective Baseline Predictor for the TrajNet Benchmark

Abstract: In recent years, there is a shift from modeling the tracking problem based on Bayesian formulation towards using deep neural networks. Towards this end, in this paper the effectiveness of various deep neural networks for predicting future pedestrian paths are evaluated. The analyzed deep networks solely rely, like in the traditional approaches, on observed tracklets without human-human interaction information. The evaluation is done on the publicly available TrajNet benchmark dataset [39], which builds up a re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the benefits of data augmentation have been reported earlier [2], [14], our analysis shows that the reason for this is that it helps to prevent learning environmental priors. The awareness of this problem is also necessary to understand certain phenomena, for example, we hypothesize that learning environmental priors is the primary reason for the bad performance of LSTMs reported in [5], instead of the missing interaction-awareness as the authors suggest.…”
Section: A Environmental Priorsmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While the benefits of data augmentation have been reported earlier [2], [14], our analysis shows that the reason for this is that it helps to prevent learning environmental priors. The awareness of this problem is also necessary to understand certain phenomena, for example, we hypothesize that learning environmental priors is the primary reason for the bad performance of LSTMs reported in [5], instead of the missing interaction-awareness as the authors suggest.…”
Section: A Environmental Priorsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…We further include four state-of-the-art models in our evaluation. These are the RNN-Encoder-MLP (RED) [14], the LSTM with State Refinement SR-LSTM [1] and for generative models Social GAN (S-GAN) [3] and the SoPhie GAN (SoPhie) [2]. We denote the CVM as OUR.…”
Section: B Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, [20] focuses on transfer learning for pedestrian motion at intersections using Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) where paths are inferred exploiting goal locations. [4] attains best performance on the challenging Stanford Drone Dataset (SDD) [17] using a recurrent-encoder and a dense layer. [22] predicts future positions in order to satisfy specific needs and to reach latent sources.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, the task of object motion prediction is done by using a Bayesian formulation in approaches such as the Kalman filter [17], or nonparametric methods, such as particle filters [4]. Driven by the success of recurrent neural networks (RNNs) in modeling temporal dependencies in a variety of sequence processing tasks, such as speech recognition [13,10] and caption generation [12,27], RNNs are increasingly utilized for object motion prediction [2,3,15,16,7]. When relying on traditional approaches, the challenge of varying dynamics over time is commonly addressed with the Interacting Multiple Model (IMM) filter [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%