2019
DOI: 10.1007/s41230-018-8165-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recycling water glass from wet reclamation sewage of waste sodium silicate-bonded sand

Abstract: Wet reclamation of waste sodium silicate-bonded sand produces much alkaline sewage and causes pollution. Recycling water glass from wet reclamation sewage of the waste sodium silicate-bonded sand can solve pollution issues and generate economic benefits. In this work, the wet reclamation sewage was filtered, and the filtrate was causticized with a quicklime powder to produce a lye. The effects of causticization temperature, causticization time, and the amount of quicklime powder on the causticization rate were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the recorded thermogravimetric analysis data for the A1 binder, the systems of Equations ( 10) and ( 11) were determined. TG = −0.3595 × T + 217.9, R = 0.9994 Based on the recorded thermogravimetric analysis data for the A1 binder, the systems of Equations ( 10) and (11) were determined. TG air = −0.3595 × T + 217.9, R 2 = 0.9994 TG Ar = −0.0159 × T + 57.269, R 2 = 0.9979 (10) TG air = −0.3652 × T + 314.99, R 2 = 0.9694 TG Ar = −0.0159 × T + 57.269, R 2 = 0.9979 (11) The solution to Equation ( 10) is the onset of the burning temperature of the binder of T s = 468 • C, while from Equation (11) for A1 binder, the temperature that is needed for the burning of T b = 738 • C can be determined (Figure 6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the recorded thermogravimetric analysis data for the A1 binder, the systems of Equations ( 10) and ( 11) were determined. TG = −0.3595 × T + 217.9, R = 0.9994 Based on the recorded thermogravimetric analysis data for the A1 binder, the systems of Equations ( 10) and (11) were determined. TG air = −0.3595 × T + 217.9, R 2 = 0.9994 TG Ar = −0.0159 × T + 57.269, R 2 = 0.9979 (10) TG air = −0.3652 × T + 314.99, R 2 = 0.9694 TG Ar = −0.0159 × T + 57.269, R 2 = 0.9979 (11) The solution to Equation ( 10) is the onset of the burning temperature of the binder of T s = 468 • C, while from Equation (11) for A1 binder, the temperature that is needed for the burning of T b = 738 • C can be determined (Figure 6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of these methods has its own advantages, and each has its own disadvantages and areas of application. In [9][10][11], the authors present grain matrix recovery methods using the wet method. The authors of have presented various solutions for mechanical reclamation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 Remaining sodium silicate are not decomposed or burned out in the casting process but instead they form a sodium silicate gel. 37 This has low melting point and strong bond strength with the sand. Residual binder and salt on the sand absorb water easily which makes dry reclamation difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three basic grain matrix recovery methods that are used: wet in water is used mainly for bentonite and water glass moulding sands; mechanical is for all types of spent moulding and core sands; thermal is for burnt binders. Due to the costs of infrastructure and water and energy consumption, wet regeneration is rarely used [1][2][3][4]. Depending on the type of binder material, the other methods are applied using different equipment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%