2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2202.04840
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recycling nonlocality in a quantum network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the maximum number reduces to two when the shared state is close to maximally entangled states. After completion of our work, we notice that when both the observers share (noisy) maximally entangled states and want to employ network nonlocality by performing unsharp measurements in star and chain networks, a maximum of two rounds of detection for network nonlocal correlations is reported [43] (cf. also [42]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, the maximum number reduces to two when the shared state is close to maximally entangled states. After completion of our work, we notice that when both the observers share (noisy) maximally entangled states and want to employ network nonlocality by performing unsharp measurements in star and chain networks, a maximum of two rounds of detection for network nonlocal correlations is reported [43] (cf. also [42]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present work, we go beyond this picture (cf. [42,43]). In particular, we consider two independent sources which produce two noisy nonmaximally entangled states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimal trade-off between quantum bound of elegant Bell inequality of Bob 1 , Bob 2 and Bob 3 are given by equation (66) and plotted in figure 4. The brown cube represents the preparation non-contextual bound showing no trade-off.…”
Section: Certification Of Multiple Unsharpness Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, in our self-testing protocol, two sequential sub-optimal quantum violations of a Bell inequality form an optimal pair powering the DI certifications of the state, the local observables, and the unsharpness parameter of one of the two parties. We also note here that all the previous works that demonstrated the sharing of various quantum correlations [16,17,56,57,[60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67], the dimension of the system was assumed. In contrast, throughout this work, we impose no bound on the dimension of the Hilbert space, and we consider that the measurement devices are black boxes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very recently, Cheng et al [37,38] showed that at most one pair of observers can share non-locality while considering the sharing for both parties. In recent years, a flurry of works have been reported to examine the number of independent sequential observers sharing different quantum correlations, viz., entanglement [39], steering [40][41][42], non-locality [35,36,[43][44][45][46][47] and preparation contextuality [32,48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%